User talk:Dw31415
RfCStats - Bad section parsing: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 14:00, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
*:Thank you for looking at it again. I'm not seeing anything wrong with that section either?—[[User:S Marshall|S Marshall]] [[User talk:S Marshall|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|C]] 16:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC) |
*:Thank you for looking at it again. I'm not seeing anything wrong with that section either?—[[User:S Marshall|S Marshall]] [[User talk:S Marshall|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|C]] 16:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
*::I just got back around to looking at this. It turns out the section had an unclosed italics tag. mwparser can be configured to ignore formatting tags. I'll try that. [[User:Dw31415|Dw31415]] ([[User talk:Dw31415#top|talk]]) 12:51, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
*::I just got back around to looking at this. It turns out the section had an unclosed italics tag. mwparser can be configured to ignore formatting tags. I'll try that. [[User:Dw31415|Dw31415]] ([[User talk:Dw31415#top|talk]]) 12:51, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*::@[[User:S Marshall|S Marshall]], Please take a look and spot check one of the RfC's (just a test run with 10 samples): [[User:DwAlphaBot/RfcEditStats#RFC Analysis Report|User:DwAlphaBot/RfcEditStats#RFC Analysis Report]] [[User:Dw31415|Dw31415]] ([[User talk:Dw31415#top|talk]]) 14:00, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
== Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment == |
== Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment == |
||
