Talk:Royal Air Maroc
Missing seating configuration for Royal Air Maroc 737 MAX family?: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 14:41, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
:::Why should it be included? And aside from that questions, then obviously if reliable source (WP:RS) cannot be found then the article is better off if the information is omitted. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 14:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
:::Why should it be included? And aside from that questions, then obviously if reliable source (WP:RS) cannot be found then the article is better off if the information is omitted. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 14:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::Fair enough, Wikipedia shouldn't necessarily be correct I guess if reputable sources can't prove it, even if it is empirically proven otherwise. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-22987-71|~2026-22987-71]] ([[User talk:~2026-22987-71|talk]]) 14:37, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
::Fair enough, Wikipedia shouldn't necessarily be correct I guess if reputable sources can't prove it, even if it is empirically proven otherwise. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-22987-71|~2026-22987-71]] ([[User talk:~2026-22987-71|talk]]) 14:37, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::Welcome to Wikipedia! Seriously. I can highly recommend a read of [[WP:NOTTRUTH]] which may explain why many editors find it so frustrating that what they know to be true is inadmissible on Wikipedia. Don't lose heart, just move onto other ways of improving your favourite topics. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 14:41, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
