Talk:Malagos Chocolate/GA1
GA review: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 11:34, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
[[User:Whonting|Whonting]] ([[User talk:Whonting|talk]]) 08:45, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
[[User:Whonting|Whonting]] ([[User talk:Whonting|talk]]) 08:45, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Whonting}} replied to all; do you still have more comments? [[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]] (''[[User:TheNuggeteer/Guestbook|My '''"blotter"''']]'') 11:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Whonting}} replied to all; do you still have more comments? [[User:TheNuggeteer|🍗TheNugg]][[User talk:TheNuggeteer|eteer🍗]] (''[[User:TheNuggeteer/Guestbook|My '''"blotter"''']]'') 11:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::I am pretty much done on prose, although the spotcheck is still outstanding etc. I notice a few places above where the sources don't support the claims to a problematic extent in an article of this size. Can you check all the TSI before I go through for a spotcheck? [[User:Whonting|Whonting]] ([[User talk:Whonting|talk]]) 11:34, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
