Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models
Llama does not have nearly as high a profile as the other models already mentioned and is similar, so I don't see why we need to include it on the list. It is a list of examples, not of every LLM someone could conceivably use.
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 21:41, 18 April 2026 | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{guideline|content guideline||WP:LLM|WP:NOLLM|WP:AIARTICLE}} |
{{guideline|content guideline||WP:LLM|WP:NOLLM|WP:AIARTICLE}} |
||
{{nutshell|Don't use [[Artificial intelligence|AI writing tools]] such as [[Wikipedia:Large language models|large language models]] to generate or rewrite article content.}} |
{{nutshell|Don't use [[Artificial intelligence|AI writing tools]] such as [[Wikipedia:Large language models|large language models]] to generate or rewrite article content.}} |
||
Text generated by [[Wikipedia:Large language models|large language models]] (LLMs){{efn|such as [[ChatGPT]], [[Google Gemini|Gemini]], [[Grok (chatbot)|Grok]], [[Claude (language model)|Claude |
Text generated by [[Wikipedia:Large language models|large language models]] (LLMs){{efn|such as [[ChatGPT]], [[Google Gemini|Gemini]], [[Grok (chatbot)|Grok]], [[Claude (language model)|Claude]], [[DeepSeek (chatbot)|DeepSeek]], or [[Grammarly]]}} often violates several of [[Wikipedia:Core content policies|Wikipedia's core content policies]]. For this reason, '''the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited''',{{efn|[[Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC]], March 2026}} save for these two exceptions: |
||
# Editors are permitted to use LLMs to suggest [[Wikipedia:Basic copyediting|basic copyedits]] to their own writing, and to incorporate some of them after human review, provided the LLM does not introduce content of its own. Caution is required, because LLMs can go beyond what is asked of them and can change the meaning of the text such that it is not [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|supported by the sources cited]]. |
# Editors are permitted to use LLMs to suggest [[Wikipedia:Basic copyediting|basic copyedits]] to their own writing, and to incorporate some of them after human review, provided the LLM does not introduce content of its own. Caution is required, because LLMs can go beyond what is asked of them and can change the meaning of the text such that it is not [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|supported by the sources cited]]. |
||
