Wikipedia:Peer review/MC2 Model Management/archive1

Apr 20, 2026 - 17:51
0 0
Wikipedia:Peer review/MC2 Model Management/archive1

formatting edit to align with how others respond

← Previous revision Revision as of 12:20, 20 April 2026
Line 9: Line 9:
Thanks, [[User:Wisenerd|Wisenerd]] ([[User talk:Wisenerd|talk]]) 04:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks, [[User:Wisenerd|Wisenerd]] ([[User talk:Wisenerd|talk]]) 04:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)


=== Comments by AdaCiccone ===
:Well, the article is clearly no longer a stub in the strictest sense because it has more than a minimal definition and some sources. Having said that, I still think the article feels wholly incomplete. The way it stands now, the article is more about the agency’s connection to Brunel and Epstein than a well-developed article about the model management itself.
Well, the article is clearly no longer a stub in the strictest sense because it has more than a minimal definition and some sources. Having said that, I still think the article feels wholly incomplete. The way it stands now, the article is more about the agency’s connection to Brunel and Epstein than a well-developed article about the model management itself.
⚫
:Structure and scope is the clear spots that need work. Nearly all of the content sits in 'Background' that does most of the work, and all within just one section. The article could be better if there are other sections such as history, its operations, the controversy and the investigation, the aftermath etc. You could also expand on whether this model management is known outside the Eipsten scandal. [[User:AdaCiccone|AdaCiccone]] ([[User talk:AdaCiccone|talk]]) 12:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

⚫
Structure and scope is the clear spots that need work. Nearly all of the content sits in 'Background' that does most of the work, and all within just one section. The article could be better if there are other sections such as history, its operations, the controversy and the investigation, the aftermath etc. You could also expand on whether this model management is known outside the Eipsten scandal. [[User:AdaCiccone|AdaCiccone]] ([[User talk:AdaCiccone|talk]]) 12:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
Read More