Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taumata o Kupe
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 19:08, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{la|1=Taumata o Kupe}} – ( |
:{{la|1=Taumata o Kupe}} – ( |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Taumata o Kupe}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Taumata o Kupe}}) |
||
There is little independent sourcing covering this learning centre with the article being promotional e.g. 'It takes a contemporaneous approach with an aerodynamic feel of modern racing yachts'. The main sources in the article provide a lot of text but a lot of it is not about the subject and falls into a heavily promotional tone, with one of the main sources being a masters thesis, which is not considered a reliable source typically. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 10:35, 13 April 2026 (UTC) |
There is little independent sourcing covering this learning centre with the article being promotional e.g. 'It takes a contemporaneous approach with an aerodynamic feel of modern racing yachts'. The main sources in the article provide a lot of text but a lot of it is not about the subject and falls into a heavily promotional tone, with one of the main sources being a masters thesis, which is not considered a reliable source typically. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 10:35, 13 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*:The sources all focus on one event (the award) and many of the sources are made up primarily of quotes, which are not independent. Property news in New Zealand is heavily made of up back-door deals and contacts as opposed to legitimate journalism and the writing shows that. Articles need to be neutral and if the only sources are non-independent and promotional then it doesn't meet the criteria for [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 21:29, 14 April 2026 (UTC) |
*:The sources all focus on one event (the award) and many of the sources are made up primarily of quotes, which are not independent. Property news in New Zealand is heavily made of up back-door deals and contacts as opposed to legitimate journalism and the writing shows that. Articles need to be neutral and if the only sources are non-independent and promotional then it doesn't meet the criteria for [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Traumnovelle|Traumnovelle]] ([[User talk:Traumnovelle|talk]]) 21:29, 14 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. Meets GNG. The building has won two (not one as asserted above) significant national awards for architecture and design, including the best building in the public architecture category of the NZIA national awards, as well as being shortlisted at the 2024 World Architecture Festival. [[User:Paora|Paora]] ([[User talk:Paora|talk]]) 11:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Meets GNG. The building has won two (not one as asserted above) significant national awards for architecture and design, including the best building in the public architecture category of the NZIA national awards, as well as being shortlisted at the 2024 World Architecture Festival. [[User:Paora|Paora]] ([[User talk:Paora|talk]]) 11:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
: '''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}''' Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Sandstein|''' Sandstein ''']] 19:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
