Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema City, Perth
Cinema City, Perth
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 23:41, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*:::That would be great! [[User:Lijil|Lijil]] ([[User talk:Lijil|talk]]) 11:28, 10 April 2026 (UTC) |
*:::That would be great! [[User:Lijil|Lijil]] ([[User talk:Lijil|talk]]) 11:28, 10 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::The video link does not give enough information to say whether it is a reliable source or gives sigcov to Cinema City. How much coverage does Hertley's book dedicate to the cinema (googlebooks doesn't show me how much coverage, only that there are two pages where it is mentioned)? Do we have a consensus on whether Women's Weekly was a reliable source in the 1980s? It may be, but my Nan used to read the British version and I wouldn't have classed it as reliable. For example, there was plenty of stuff about mediums, ghosts etc., as well as tabloid aspects.--[[User:Boynamedsue|Boynamedsue]] ([[User talk:Boynamedsue|talk]]) 07:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
:::The video link does not give enough information to say whether it is a reliable source or gives sigcov to Cinema City. How much coverage does Hertley's book dedicate to the cinema (googlebooks doesn't show me how much coverage, only that there are two pages where it is mentioned)? Do we have a consensus on whether Women's Weekly was a reliable source in the 1980s? It may be, but my Nan used to read the British version and I wouldn't have classed it as reliable. For example, there was plenty of stuff about mediums, ghosts etc., as well as tabloid aspects.--[[User:Boynamedsue|Boynamedsue]] ([[User talk:Boynamedsue|talk]]) 07:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''': fails GNG. [[User:StartOkayStop|StartOkayStop]] ([[User talk:StartOkayStop|talk]]) 03:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC) |
* |
||
: '''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}''' Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 03:35, 17 April 2026 (UTC) |
: '''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}''' Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 03:35, 17 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. I'm satisfied with the sources provided by Lijil. Not sure what the last !vote is talking about, this plainly and obviously meets GNG based on the sources currently in the article. [[User:MediaKyle|MediaKyle]] ([[User talk:MediaKyle|talk]]) 10:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. I'm satisfied with the sources provided by Lijil. Not sure what the last !vote is talking about, this plainly and obviously meets GNG based on the sources currently in the article. [[User:MediaKyle|MediaKyle]] ([[User talk:MediaKyle|talk]]) 10:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
