Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat/Workshop
Case requesters reminded: suggestion for wording
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 19:11, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 560: | Line 560: | ||
:: Ah, going bold anyways, but I decided "case requesters" because I think it should apply to also anyone else, like... me. Nonetheless, this might need some work as my wording may not be so great. |
:: Ah, going bold anyways, but I decided "case requesters" because I think it should apply to also anyone else, like... me. Nonetheless, this might need some work as my wording may not be so great. |
||
:: As I shall further note, this isn't against Robert personally. I'm just basing this on my evidence and HJ Marshall's evidence and proposals here. —[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 18:32, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
:: As I shall further note, this isn't against Robert personally. I'm just basing this on my evidence and HJ Marshall's evidence and proposals here. —[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 18:32, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::Should this reminder be adopted, I suggest something like "present reasoning for accepting a case" rather than "prove". In my view, incontrovertible proof is too high as a standard. [[User:Isaacl|isaacl]] ([[User talk:Isaacl|talk]]) 19:11, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
==Proposals by Gerda Arendt== |
==Proposals by Gerda Arendt== |
||
