User talk:TJ Kreen

[[User:Mmemaigret|MmeMaigret]] ([[User talk:Mmemaigret|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Mmemaigret|MmeMaigret]] ([[User talk:Mmemaigret|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

== January 2026 ==

Please remember that you have been told multiple times that Wikipedia works on the basis of information directly drawn from reliable sources only. So you are not in a position to make uncited claims – including about alleged historical flags, which require [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verification]] like anything else – unless you are citing those sources clearly. Also, in case this is part of the confusion, both the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|"reliable sources"]] policy and the [[Wikipedia:No original research|"no original research"]] policy explain what counts as reliable; so it's more than merely the presence of any citation: it has to be reliable and relevant (for example, for history articles, peer-reviewed works by academic historians are expected). Among other things, [[Wikipedia:Primary source|primary sources]] usually do not count, as they require academic interpretation, which should not be done by Wikipedia editors themselves. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zayyanid_capture_of_Fez&diff=prev&oldid=1333601740 These] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barbary_Crusade&diff=prev&oldid=1333602168 kinds] of reverts, where you re-impose your own edit and demand that the other editor(s) satisfy you instead, are therefore non-constructive, in addition to being [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit-warring]]. I hope this makes things clearer. Thanks, [[User:R Prazeres|R Prazeres]] ([[User talk:R Prazeres|talk]]) 22:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

:“Where you re-impose your own edit and demand that the other editor(s) satisfy you instead” is such a harsh assessment of the situation that it becomes blatantly untrue. [[User:TJ Kreen|TJ Kreen]] ([[User talk:TJ Kreen#top|talk]]) 22:42, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

::In addition, I was not “demanding”, I was simply requesting for reasons that the flags were fictional. And if I was demanding by asking about the credibility of flags, you have been doing it FAR longer than I have. [[User:TJ Kreen|TJ Kreen]] ([[User talk:TJ Kreen#top|talk]]) 22:48, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] '''You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]], according to the reverts you've made to [[:Zayyanid Capture of Sijilmasa (1264)]].''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

# {{strong|Edit warring is [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive behavior]] – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}

# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.}} [[User:R Prazeres|R Prazeres]] ([[User talk:R Prazeres|talk]]) 17:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

== Anglo-Bruneian War ==

== Anglo-Bruneian War ==