User talk:Houtyuhn
Section headings: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 05:40, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
I can understand your logic for wanting to split accidents and incidents, but the section heading is a standard thing defined by the relevant Wiki Project to ensure consistency across articles. See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]]. Thanks. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 05:12, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
I can understand your logic for wanting to split accidents and incidents, but the section heading is a standard thing defined by the relevant Wiki Project to ensure consistency across articles. See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]]. Thanks. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 05:12, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:"I appreciate the need for consistency, but the '''WikiProject Aircraft'''guidelines also emphasize '''[WP:UNDUE]''' and '''[WP:CONTEXT]'''. |
|||
:The 2009 Bruntingthorpe event is a '''post-retirement incident''' involving a museum aircraft (XM715) on a 'fast taxi' run. Mixing it with a list of fatal RAF service crashes creates a false equivalence. It is functionally different from the operational losses and more relevant to the aircraft's status as a '''Surviving Aircraft'''. |
|||
:If a separate section heading is strictly forbidden, I propose creating a '''sub-heading''' (Level 3) under 'Accidents and incidents' specifically for ''' |
|||
