Template talk:Gaza genocide sidebar
RfC: Only include bidirectional links in sidebar?: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 03:07, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
:'''Comment:''' This entire RfC seems to be based on an assumption that the guideline says something it doesn't. The guideline says {{tq|Every article that transcludes a given navigation template should normally also be included as a link in the template, so that the navigation is bidirectional.}} but not the other way around, and therefore the template doesn't need an exception as it is not a situation covered by the guideline. The guideline does not say everything must be bidirectional, it says that if an article transcludes a navigation template then it should be bidirectional. If a navigation template includes an article there is nothing saying that the navigation must be made bidirectional. In other words, an article generally cannot transclude a navigation template without being included as a link in the navigation template, but a navigation template can include an article as a link without having to be transcluded onto that page. |
:'''Comment:''' This entire RfC seems to be based on an assumption that the guideline says something it doesn't. The guideline says {{tq|Every article that transcludes a given navigation template should normally also be included as a link in the template, so that the navigation is bidirectional.}} but not the other way around, and therefore the template doesn't need an exception as it is not a situation covered by the guideline. The guideline does not say everything must be bidirectional, it says that if an article transcludes a navigation template then it should be bidirectional. If a navigation template includes an article there is nothing saying that the navigation must be made bidirectional. In other words, an article generally cannot transclude a navigation template without being included as a link in the navigation template, but a navigation template can include an article as a link without having to be transcluded onto that page. |
||
:I simply cannot see how the guideline can be read to say otherwise. ⹃[[User:Maltazarian|Maltazarian]] ᚾ[[User talk:Maltazarian|parley]][[Special:Contributions/Maltazarian|investigate]]ᛅ 03:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
:I simply cannot see how the guideline can be read to say otherwise. ⹃[[User:Maltazarian|Maltazarian]] ᚾ[[User talk:Maltazarian|parley]][[Special:Contributions/Maltazarian|investigate]]ᛅ 03:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::I genuinely need an explanation from the editors who read this a different way than I do here because I'm completely at a loss as to how this discussion has played out the way it has. ⹃[[User:Maltazarian|Maltazarian]] ᚾ[[User talk:Maltazarian|parley]][[Special:Contributions/Maltazarian|investigate]]ᛅ 03:07, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||