Talk:Welsh Not
Over reliance on a single source?: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 17:08, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
:::::I do think this page reads as one-sided. [[User:Pendle Which|Pendle Which]] ([[User talk:Pendle Which|talk]]) 16:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
:::::I do think this page reads as one-sided. [[User:Pendle Which|Pendle Which]] ([[User talk:Pendle Which|talk]]) 16:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::::@[[User:Deb|Deb]], I don't want argue with you about your personal views on the Welsh Not, our own opinions should not have any sway on our writing. Johnes is in an historian who has researched the subject and views thus have significance. Can you suggest any alternative historians who could provide a different perspective? [[User:Llewee|Llewee]] ([[User talk:Llewee|talk]]) 16:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
::::@[[User:Deb|Deb]], I don't want argue with you about your personal views on the Welsh Not, our own opinions should not have any sway on our writing. Johnes is in an historian who has researched the subject and views thus have significance. Can you suggest any alternative historians who could provide a different perspective? [[User:Llewee|Llewee]] ([[User talk:Llewee|talk]]) 16:25, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::::I'm sure there are. In fact, some of Johnes' own books appear to contradict some of what he says in the one referenced here. Having said that, looking back at the text of his book, I think some of the content has been unintentionally misrepresented in the wording of the article. [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 17:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
