Talk:Union type

Apr 20, 2026 - 22:39
0 0
Talk:Union type

using in C++ examples: 3O Decline due to stale request; welcome to re-file

← Previous revision Revision as of 17:07, 20 April 2026
Line 144: Line 144:
:::::::::::::Yeah, no one knows what you're talking about, and you're just casting [[WP:ASPERSIONS]], and you're just proving to everyone that you're unwilling to participate in good faith. Disputing content doesn't constitute an edit war, especially edits built on factually untrue claims (that import std; is unsupported by most compilers, that it's not standard, that it doesn't work because you don't want to bother making it work, etc.
:::::::::::::Yeah, no one knows what you're talking about, and you're just casting [[WP:ASPERSIONS]], and you're just proving to everyone that you're unwilling to participate in good faith. Disputing content doesn't constitute an edit war, especially edits built on factually untrue claims (that import std; is unsupported by most compilers, that it's not standard, that it doesn't work because you don't want to bother making it work, etc.
:::::::::::::But expecting anything fruitful, or even expecting compromise, is apparently too much to ask for. You've yet to reasonably justify why my compromise proposal is unacceptable, beyond hiding behind [[WP:REHASH]]ing "people disagree" (literally only you have voiced disagreement to my compromise proposal) and trying to urge others to "let it go" on the assumption that you yourself are not [[WP:BLUDGEON]]ing the process by unilaterally dictating what can and cannot go into an article. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-21913-57|~2026-21913-57]] ([[User talk:~2026-21913-57|talk]]) 20:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::::::But expecting anything fruitful, or even expecting compromise, is apparently too much to ask for. You've yet to reasonably justify why my compromise proposal is unacceptable, beyond hiding behind [[WP:REHASH]]ing "people disagree" (literally only you have voiced disagreement to my compromise proposal) and trying to urge others to "let it go" on the assumption that you yourself are not [[WP:BLUDGEON]]ing the process by unilaterally dictating what can and cannot go into an article. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-21913-57|~2026-21913-57]] ([[User talk:~2026-21913-57|talk]]) 20:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::::::[[File:Pictogram voting comment.png|18px]] '''[[Wikipedia:Third Opinion|3O]] Response:''' I have removed a request for a third opinion for this dispute because the request had become stale. If a third opinion is still desired, you are welcome to re-file per the instructions at [[WP:3O]]. You are also welcome to pursue other forms of [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 17:07, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
Read More