Talk:Scots language
This is not a language . . . until it is.: r
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 21:36, 18 April 2026 | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
Still, given the fact that it's still an open question amongst scholars as to whether "Scots" is a full-blown language or just a dialect, this article ought to leave it that way: ''open''. It should not be claiming categorically that Scots indeed qualifies as a "language."[[User:Mwidunn|Mwidunn]] ([[User talk:Mwidunn|talk]]) 20:27, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
Still, given the fact that it's still an open question amongst scholars as to whether "Scots" is a full-blown language or just a dialect, this article ought to leave it that way: ''open''. It should not be claiming categorically that Scots indeed qualifies as a "language."[[User:Mwidunn|Mwidunn]] ([[User talk:Mwidunn|talk]]) 20:27, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:It does leave it open, reports the diversity of opinion and it makes no categorical claim either way. [[WP:NOTFORUM|"Uneducated opinions" should not go on talk pages]]. [[User:Mutt Lunker|Mutt Lunker]] ([[User talk:Mutt Lunker|talk]]) 21:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
