Talk:Perfect Crown
Critical Response Section – WP:UNDUE and WP:RECENTISM Concerns: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 03:31, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::Thank you! [[User:SilentSc0pe|SilentSc0pe]] ([[User talk:SilentSc0pe|talk]]) 01:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
::Thank you! [[User:SilentSc0pe|SilentSc0pe]] ([[User talk:SilentSc0pe|talk]]) 01:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:Clearly [[WP:RECENTISM]] and [[WP:UNDUE]], particularly when only four of 12 episodes have aired. As written, the section reads less like a proportionate summary of reception than a coatrack for repetitive criticism, contrary to [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]]. It is also not balanced. [[WP:UNDUE]] applies to the article as a whole, not just to an individual section. Accordingly, there are two related weight problems here: first, the reception section itself gives undue weight to repetitive critical commentary; second, reception as a whole appears to occupy a disproportionate share of the article, making the weight problem article-wide as well as section-specific. What happens on [[WP:OTHERCONTENT]] is not binding precedent and does not overrride the policies and guidelines, if there was such misconception. I have also proceeded to tag the section accordingly, as it clearly requires cleanup under the relevant policies and guidelines. '''— [[User:Paper9oll|Paper9oll]] ([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])''' 03:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
:Clearly [[WP:RECENTISM]] and [[WP:UNDUE]], particularly when only four of 12 episodes have aired. As written, the section reads less like a proportionate summary of reception than a coatrack for repetitive criticism, contrary to [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]]. It is also not balanced. [[WP:UNDUE]] applies to the article as a whole, not just to an individual section. Accordingly, there are two related weight problems here: first, the reception section itself gives undue weight to repetitive critical commentary; second, reception as a whole appears to occupy a disproportionate share of the article, making the weight problem article-wide as well as section-specific. What happens on [[WP:OTHERCONTENT]] is not binding precedent and does not overrride the policies and guidelines, if there was such misconception. I have also proceeded to tag the section accordingly, as it clearly requires cleanup under the relevant policies and guidelines. '''— [[User:Paper9oll|Paper9oll]] ([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])''' 03:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::Thank you @[[User:Paper9oll|Paper9oll]] for the thorough review and for tagging the section. I fully support the cleanup and am ready to help propose a condensed, balanced version whenever the discussion is ready to move forward. [[User:SilentSc0pe|SilentSc0pe]] ([[User talk:SilentSc0pe|talk]]) 03:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||