dismissed as improvidently listed
| ← Previous revision |
Revision as of 13:31, 19 April 2026 |
| Line 30: |
Line 30: |
|
* ''[[United States v. Thompson]]'', 941 F.2d 1074 (10th Cir. 1991) |
|
* ''[[United States v. Thompson]]'', 941 F.2d 1074 (10th Cir. 1991) |
|
* ''[[Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft Corp.]]'', 985 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1993) |
|
* ''[[Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft Corp.]]'', 985 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1993) |
|
* ''[[MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Service Commission]]'', 216 F.3d 929 (10th Cir. 2000) |
|
|
* ''[[Powers v. Harris]]'', 379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004)[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=2005 |title=''Powers v. Harris'': How the Tenth Circuit buried economic liberties |url=https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1597&context=dlr |journal=[[Denver University Law Review]] |volume=82 |issue=3 |pages=585–612 |access-date=April 19, 2026}}|{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Daniel J. |last2=Trudeau |first2=Noah J. |date=2019 |title=The undertaker's cut: Challenging the rational basis for casket licensure |url=https://journal.apee.org/2019Journal_of_Private_Enterprise_Vol_34_No_2_Summer_PARTE2 |journal=[[The Journal of Private Enterprise]] |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=23–41 |access-date=April 19, 2026}}}}] |
|
* ''[[Powers v. Harris]]'', 379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004)[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=2005 |title=''Powers v. Harris'': How the Tenth Circuit buried economic liberties |url=https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1597&context=dlr |journal=[[Denver University Law Review]] |volume=82 |issue=3 |pages=585–612 |access-date=April 19, 2026}}|{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Daniel J. |last2=Trudeau |first2=Noah J. |date=2019 |title=The undertaker's cut: Challenging the rational basis for casket licensure |url=https://journal.apee.org/2019Journal_of_Private_Enterprise_Vol_34_No_2_Summer_PARTE2 |journal=[[The Journal of Private Enterprise]] |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=23–41 |access-date=April 19, 2026}}}}] |
|
* ''[[Osage Nation v. Irby]]'', 597 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2010)[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Moschovidis |first=Barbara |date=2011 |title=''Osage Nation v. Irby'': The Tenth Circuit disregards legal precedent to strip Osage County of its reservation status |url=https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1110&context=ailr |journal=[[American Indian Law Review]] |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=189–222 |access-date=April 17, 2026}}|{{Cite journal |last=Tinker |first=Philip H. |date=2011 |title=Is Oklahoma still Indian Country? 'Justifiable expectations' and reservation disestablishment in ''Murphy v. Sirmons'' and ''Osage Nation v. Irby'' |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120306015922id_/http://www.dartmouthlawjournal.org/archives/9.3.5.pdf |journal=[[Dartmouth Law Journal]] |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=120–162 |access-date=April 17, 2026 |via=[[archive.org]]}}}}] |
|
* ''[[Osage Nation v. Irby]]'', 597 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2010)[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Moschovidis |first=Barbara |date=2011 |title=''Osage Nation v. Irby'': The Tenth Circuit disregards legal precedent to strip Osage County of its reservation status |url=https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1110&context=ailr |journal=[[American Indian Law Review]] |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=189–222 |access-date=April 17, 2026}}|{{Cite journal |last=Tinker |first=Philip H. |date=2011 |title=Is Oklahoma still Indian Country? 'Justifiable expectations' and reservation disestablishment in ''Murphy v. Sirmons'' and ''Osage Nation v. Irby'' |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120306015922id_/http://www.dartmouthlawjournal.org/archives/9.3.5.pdf |journal=[[Dartmouth Law Journal]] |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=120–162 |access-date=April 17, 2026 |via=[[archive.org]]}}}}] |
