Talk:Federal monarchy
Canada, Australia and others: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 03:29, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 273: | Line 273: | ||
:The key line is "retaining '''different''' monarchs ... in the various states joined to the federation.” Canada, Australia and St Kitts do not have '''different''' monarchs at the state / province level. The King is the head of state for the provinces and states; same king is the sovereign at both the federal and state/province level, therefore not a federal monarchy. [[User:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz|Mr Serjeant Buzfuz]] ([[User talk:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz|talk]]) 01:11, 9 June 2025 (UTC) |
:The key line is "retaining '''different''' monarchs ... in the various states joined to the federation.” Canada, Australia and St Kitts do not have '''different''' monarchs at the state / province level. The King is the head of state for the provinces and states; same king is the sovereign at both the federal and state/province level, therefore not a federal monarchy. [[User:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz|Mr Serjeant Buzfuz]] ([[User talk:Mr Serjeant Buzfuz|talk]]) 01:11, 9 June 2025 (UTC) |
||
::But why should the article even be restriction to this definition to begin with? (See response in "Removed Canada and Australia" section.) [[Special:Contributions/~2026-17956-01|~2026-17956-01]] ([[User talk:~2026-17956-01|talk]]) 03:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
::But why should the article even be restriction to this definition to begin with? (See response in "Removed Canada and Australia" section.) [[Special:Contributions/~2026-17956-01|~2026-17956-01]] ([[User talk:~2026-17956-01|talk]]) 03:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::This article is about a particular topic, it is not about other topics. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 03:29, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
