Talk:Bamba (snack)
Requested move 14 April 2026
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 10:26, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
::Furthermore, we should also look at the [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamba_(name) all-time mass views for all items linked from Bamba (name)], which also serves a disambiguation function here. There we see [[Mo Bamba]] averaging 579 views/day, [[Sol Bamba]] at 417/day, [[Bamba Müller]] at 170/day, etc etc. This compares quite favorably to 110/day for the proposed primary topic. |
::Furthermore, we should also look at the [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=all-time&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamba_(name) all-time mass views for all items linked from Bamba (name)], which also serves a disambiguation function here. There we see [[Mo Bamba]] averaging 579 views/day, [[Sol Bamba]] at 417/day, [[Bamba Müller]] at 170/day, etc etc. This compares quite favorably to 110/day for the proposed primary topic. |
||
::It's easy to say that the snack is the single most popular mononymously named item named Bamba that we have documented, but this level of usage does not indicate it's a primary topic. --[[User:Joy|Joy]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 18:53, 15 April 2026 (UTC) |
::It's easy to say that the snack is the single most popular mononymously named item named Bamba that we have documented, but this level of usage does not indicate it's a primary topic. --[[User:Joy|Joy]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 18:53, 15 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. No primary topic here. The fact that the places are disambiguated is utterly irrelevant. So is this! -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 10:26, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
