Talk:A
Pronunciation: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 13:32, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
: Now, we can certainly make a case for removing that statement from the lead completely, for being utterly trivial. In fact, anybody who has ever learned to recite the a-b-c in English already knows how the name is pronounced; and people who haven't learned the a-b-c are unlikely to come here to read this article, so we are literally not telling anybody anything new there (unlike with cases such as |
: Now, we can certainly make a case for removing that statement from the lead completely, for being utterly trivial. In fact, anybody who has ever learned to recite the a-b-c in English already knows how the name is pronounced; and people who haven't learned the a-b-c are unlikely to come here to read this article, so we are literally not telling anybody anything new there (unlike with cases such as |
||
::How does that explain or justify use of a recording of just one of the many ways to pronounce it? [[User:JMF|𝕁𝕄𝔽]] ([[User talk:JMF|talk]]) 13:32, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
