| ← Previous revision |
Revision as of 23:02, 19 April 2026 |
| Line 96: |
Line 96: |
|
==[[United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|Tenth Circuit]]== |
|
==[[United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|Tenth Circuit]]== |
|
*''[[Moritz v. Commissioner]]'', 469 F.2d 466 (10th Cir. 1972): [[Equal Protection Clause]] prevents the [[Internal Revenue Service]] from [[Sex discrimination|discriminating on the basis of sex]], which they did by making a certain [[Tax deduction|deduction]] only available to women and former married men. |
|
*''[[Moritz v. Commissioner]]'', 469 F.2d 466 (10th Cir. 1972): [[Equal Protection Clause]] prevents the [[Internal Revenue Service]] from [[Sex discrimination|discriminating on the basis of sex]], which they did by making a certain [[Tax deduction|deduction]] only available to women and former married men. |
|
*''[[National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education]]'', 729 F.2d 1270 (10th Cir. 1984): [[Due Process Clause|Due Process]] and [[Equal Protection Clause|Equal Protection Clauses]] do not prevent [[Oklahoma]] from firing schoolteachers for engaging in "homosexual activity", but the Free Speech Clause does prevent Oklahoma from firing teachers for advocating for it. |
|
*''[[National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education]]'', 729 F.2d 1270 (10th Cir. 1984): [[Due Process Clause|Due Process]] and [[Equal Protection Clause|Equal Protection Clauses]] do not prohibit [[Oklahoma]] from firing schoolteachers for engaging in "homosexual activity", but the Free Speech Clause does prohibit Oklahoma from firing teachers for advocating for it. |
|
|
* ''[[Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft Corp.]]'', 985 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1993): The [[Federal Aviation Act]] does not [[Federal preemption|preempt]] states from setting their own [[aviation safety]] standards. |
|
*''[[Thompson v. Johnson County Community College]]'', 108 F.3d 1388 (10th Cir. 1997): Worker privacy in bathrooms or changing rooms. |
|
*''[[Thompson v. Johnson County Community College]]'', 108 F.3d 1388 (10th Cir. 1997): Worker privacy in bathrooms or changing rooms. |
|
* ''[[Powers v. Harris]]'', 379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004): The [[Fourteenth Amendment]] does not prohibit Oklahoma from requiring [[coffin]] salespeople to be licensed [[funeral home]] directors. |
|
* ''[[Powers v. Harris]]'', 379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004): The [[Fourteenth Amendment]] does not prohibit Oklahoma from requiring [[coffin]] salespeople to be licensed [[funeral home]] directors. |
| Line 154: |
Line 155: |
|
|
|
|
|
[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Cox |first=Joseph M. |date=2012 |title=Forget me not: The battle for private situs roadside memorials in the wake of ''American Atheists v. Duncan'' |journal=[[Northwestern Interdisciplinary Law Review]] |volume=5 |pages=1–38}}|{{Cite journal |last=Lau |first=Steven Michael |date=March 1, 2011 |title=Ignoring purpose, context, and history: The Tenth Circuit Court in ''American Atheists, Inc. v. Duncan'' |url=https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2583&context=lawreview |journal=[[Brigham Young University Law Review]] |volume=2011 |issue=1 |pages=149–170 |access-date=April 17, 2026}}}}]
|
|
[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Cox |first=Joseph M. |date=2012 |title=Forget me not: The battle for private situs roadside memorials in the wake of ''American Atheists v. Duncan'' |journal=[[Northwestern Interdisciplinary Law Review]] |volume=5 |pages=1–38}}|{{Cite journal |last=Lau |first=Steven Michael |date=March 1, 2011 |title=Ignoring purpose, context, and history: The Tenth Circuit Court in ''American Atheists, Inc. v. Duncan'' |url=https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2583&context=lawreview |journal=[[Brigham Young University Law Review]] |volume=2011 |issue=1 |pages=149–170 |access-date=April 17, 2026}}}}]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[{{mref|{{Cite journal |last=Harvey |first=Lance M. |date=1994 |title=''Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft Corp.'': The Tenth Circuit holds that the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 does not preempt state common law claims for negligent design |journal=[[Baylor Law Review]] |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=485–508}}|{{Cite journal |last=Pitko |first=Shari L. |date=1993 |title=Aviation law: Preemption of state tort law claims by the Federal Aviation Act – do state tort law claims survive the attack? |url=https://contentdm.washburnlaw.edu/digital/api/collection/wlj/id/4610/download |journal=[[Washburn Law Journal]] |volume=33 |issue=1 |pages=234–246 |access-date=April 19, 2026}}}}]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[{{unbulleted list citebundle|{{cite journal |last=Fortier |first=Sarah |year=2020–2021 |title=''Edmo v. Corizon'': Properly Protecting Gender Confirmation Surgery by Applying a Flawed Test |url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/gonlr56&i=605 |journal=[[Gonzaga Law Review]] |volume=56 |issue=3 |pages=581–594 |url-access=subscription |access-date=February 23, 2026}}|{{cite journal |last=Parsi |first=John |year=2024 |title=Medical consensus on gender affirming care's critical impact on black transgender women |url=https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jlh/vol38/iss1/9/ |journal=[[Journal of Law and Health]] |volume=38 |issue=1 |pages=66–101 |access-date=February 23, 2026}}|{{cite journal |last=Cloward |first=J. Gregory |year=2020–2021 |title=A (cruel and) unusual decision: Questions raised for the Fifth Circuit moving forward from ''Gibson v. Collier'' |url=https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1842&context=nlj |journal=[[Nevada Law Journal]] |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=405–436 |access-date=February 23, 2026}}}}]
|
|
[{{unbulleted list citebundle|{{cite journal |last=Fortier |first=Sarah |year=2020–2021 |title=''Edmo v. Corizon'': Properly Protecting Gender Confirmation Surgery by Applying a Flawed Test |url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/gonlr56&i=605 |journal=[[Gonzaga Law Review]] |volume=56 |issue=3 |pages=581–594 |url-access=subscription |access-date=February 23, 2026}}|{{cite journal |last=Parsi |first=John |year=2024 |title=Medical consensus on gender affirming care's critical impact on black transgender women |url=https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jlh/vol38/iss1/9/ |journal=[[Journal of Law and Health]] |volume=38 |issue=1 |pages=66–101 |access-date=February 23, 2026}}|{{cite journal |last=Cloward |first=J. Gregory |year=2020–2021 |title=A (cruel and) unusual decision: Questions raised for the Fifth Circuit moving forward from ''Gibson v. Collier'' |url=https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1842&context=nlj |journal=[[Nevada Law Journal]] |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=405–436 |access-date=February 23, 2026}}}}]
|
