Wikipedia:Peer review/Menches/archive1
RoySmith: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 21:54, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
******:Yeah, what you've got now looks good, thanks. [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 20:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
******:Yeah, what you've got now looks good, thanks. [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 20:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*******:{{re|RoySmith}} Thank you! And sorry to keep bothering you with this. [[User:Edward056686|Edward056686]] ([[User talk:Edward056686|talk]]) 21:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
*******:{{re|RoySmith}} Thank you! And sorry to keep bothering you with this. [[User:Edward056686|Edward056686]] ([[User talk:Edward056686|talk]]) 21:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*******::Not a problem. It's a nice little article about a subject that I knew nothing about yet kept my interest to the end. Good job. I'm looking forward to seeing this at FAC. [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 21:54, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Menches shared the position of scribe with a man named Petesouchos, who might have been his brother or nephew. ''' Earlier you say Petesouchos was his father. |
*'''Menches shared the position of scribe with a man named Petesouchos, who might have been his brother or nephew. ''' Earlier you say Petesouchos was his father. |
||
**These are apparently two different men. It was very common for families to reuse names (such as naming a son after his father or grandfather), so they might have been related. I tried to make the distinction more clear. [[User:Edward056686|Edward056686]] ([[User talk:Edward056686|talk]]) 04:10, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
**These are apparently two different men. It was very common for families to reuse names (such as naming a son after his father or grandfather), so they might have been related. I tried to make the distinction more clear. [[User:Edward056686|Edward056686]] ([[User talk:Edward056686|talk]]) 04:10, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
