Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maghreb/Proposed decision

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maghreb/Proposed decision

support tag-team editing FoF and corresponding principles

← Previous revision Revision as of 05:28, 21 April 2026
Line 169: Line 169:
:# [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 04:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 04:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# ~ Jenson ([[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]]) 05:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# ~ Jenson ([[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]]) 05:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# goes to the tag-team edit warring FoF. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 05:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


:Oppose:
:Oppose:
Line 187: Line 188:
:# [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 04:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 04:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# ~ Jenson ([[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]]) 05:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# ~ Jenson ([[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]]) 05:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# With a nod towards the tag-team editing warring FoF. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 05:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


:Oppose:
:Oppose:
Line 223: Line 225:
:# [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 04:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# [[User:Elli|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Elli|contribs]]) 04:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# ~ Jenson ([[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]]) 05:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# ~ Jenson ([[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]]) 05:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:# Illuminates the tag-team edit warring FoF nicely. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 05:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


:Oppose:
:Oppose:
Line 282: Line 285:


:Support:
:Support:
:# [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maghreb/Evidence#S&R appear out of thin air to help win disputes|The "jump-in" evidence]] is what clinches it for me. A lot of the evidence highlights actions that could definitely be examples of coordinating, but also have more innocent explanations. But when your first edit to an article is to back up an ideological ally, those explanations aren't available anymore. From there, the innocent explanations for the rest of the evidence just isn't credible anymore: If these editors are gonna do that, there's no reason for me to assume that their edits just so happen to goad newer editors into breaking 3RR, undermine the usefulness of 3O, and influence any noticeboard discussion that could potentially end in an adverse content or conduct result for a friend. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 05:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
:#


:Oppose:
:Oppose: