User:Halleyne/Century of humiliation/Glenn Khan35 Peer Review
Added responses to assignment questions.
New page
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org peer review/guide}}
==General info==
;Whose work are you reviewing?
Halleyne
;Link to draft you're reviewing
;[[User:Halleyne/Century of humiliation]]
;Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
;[[Century of humiliation]]
== Evaluate the drafted changes ==
I believe that the drafted changes flow nicely into the tone and mood of the original article. The article is essentially a compilation of all of China's losses, and the edits made to the article help to reinforce the idea, while still keeping a neutral tone that a Wikipedia article is supposed to have. However, I do feel like the citations could be placed in better positions. I feel like the line "'''By painting China as a victim, the Chinese Communist Party was able to continuously invoke the painful memory of the century of humiliation to maintain its legitimacy and justify its harsh actions against foreigners"''' deserves to be accredited to a citation if it was taken from a specific source. A big claim is being made here, and it would be good if you had scholars in the field to back up what you say. Citations are also missing from the 'End of Humiliation', so make sure to provide the necessary citations there as when placing the edits into the argument. You're adding in something that is meant to be a historical fact, so it would be good for people to know where you got the information from.
==General info==
;Whose work are you reviewing?
Halleyne
;Link to draft you're reviewing
;[[User:Halleyne/Century of humiliation]]
;Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
;[[Century of humiliation]]
== Evaluate the drafted changes ==
I believe that the drafted changes flow nicely into the tone and mood of the original article. The article is essentially a compilation of all of China's losses, and the edits made to the article help to reinforce the idea, while still keeping a neutral tone that a Wikipedia article is supposed to have. However, I do feel like the citations could be placed in better positions. I feel like the line "'''By painting China as a victim, the Chinese Communist Party was able to continuously invoke the painful memory of the century of humiliation to maintain its legitimacy and justify its harsh actions against foreigners"''' deserves to be accredited to a citation if it was taken from a specific source. A big claim is being made here, and it would be good if you had scholars in the field to back up what you say. Citations are also missing from the 'End of Humiliation', so make sure to provide the necessary citations there as when placing the edits into the argument. You're adding in something that is meant to be a historical fact, so it would be good for people to know where you got the information from.
