User talk:Gnomingstuff

== [[Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas]] ==

== [[Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas]] ==

You are invited to participate in the '''[[Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas|Destubathon of the Americas]]''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|''Dr. Blofeld'']] 17:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in the '''[[Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas|Destubathon of the Americas]]''', a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|''Dr. Blofeld'']] 17:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

== Hi, again! LLM generated WikiProject main page? ==

Hello, sorry to pester you, but I wanted an opinion from an editor who's more experienced with dealing with AI and has a better nose for this kind of stuff. I think I've found a possibly LLM written page in the wild again. This time, at the main page for [[Wikipedia:Help_Project]], but I'm not confident.

I saw a lot of rule-of-threes [[WP:AISIGNS]], and some of the vocabulary feels overly corporate. It also seems overly general, like it's not describing particular things an editor can do to help maintain information pages and the pages in the Help: namespace, and it's just extrapolating good ways to contribute to a wiki with vague notions of streamlining instructions. I put the page source through GPTZero (though I know machine AI detection can be unreliable) and got a 71% confidence it's AI generated.

I checked the version history, and it seems an editor has rewritten the page from scratch to replace [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_Project&oldid=1334924590 this version], which I felt was a lot more preferable. Regardless of whether the new version is AI generated or not, I think I might discuss reverting to the old version just because I think it's more friendly and seems more informative.

Please let me know what you think. I don't really want to accuse an editor of rewriting a page with AI if I'm not sure. I'm aware it also wouldn't be prohibited if it is AI generated, as the edits predate [[WP:NOLLM]] and the page isn't in mainspace, but I still think it would be preferable to have a human written main project page. [[User:MEN_KISSING|MEN KISSING]] (she/they) [[User_talk:MEN_KISSING|Talk to me, I don't bite!]] - [[Special:Contributions/MEN_KISSING|See my edits]] 22:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)