Talk:Urushiol
Most animals are unaffected by urushiol, where in the article should this be stated?: new section
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 21:08, 1 May 2026 | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
:I'm seeing the same thing. I'm going to go ahead and alter that passage, to be clear that he ''claimed'' results. [[Special:Contributions/2604:6000:1506:D5A4:AD52:7199:756C:D7AA|2604:6000:1506:D5A4:AD52:7199:756C:D7AA]] ([[User talk:2604:6000:1506:D5A4:AD52:7199:756C:D7AA|talk]]) 21:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC) |
:I'm seeing the same thing. I'm going to go ahead and alter that passage, to be clear that he ''claimed'' results. [[Special:Contributions/2604:6000:1506:D5A4:AD52:7199:756C:D7AA|2604:6000:1506:D5A4:AD52:7199:756C:D7AA]] ([[User talk:2604:6000:1506:D5A4:AD52:7199:756C:D7AA|talk]]) 21:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Most animals are unaffected by urushiol, where in the article should this be stated? == |
|||
I have found in my research that most animals are not adversely affected by urushiol, only humans and possibly a few other primates have a strong allergic response to it. (From the Smithsonian Institute[https://www.si.edu/stories/poison-ivy-primer]) This should definitely be stated somewhere in the article, but I'm not sure where in the article would be most appropriate for this. The intro, the "Allergic response and treatment section," or the "Mechanism of action" section all seem like viable candidates. [[User:RedKnight7146|RedKnight7146]] ([[User talk:RedKnight7146|talk]]) 21:08, 1 May 2026 (UTC) |
|||
