Talk:The Epoch Times

Apr 21, 2026 - 05:27

0 0

Arbitrary break

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:56, 20 April 2026
Line 482:		Line 482:
	::::::::::::::::::{{Tq\|purely based on deductive reasoning}} That's considered a synonym for [[WP:OR]] here.		::::::::::::::::::{{Tq\|purely based on deductive reasoning}} That's considered a synonym for [[WP:OR]] here.
	::::::::::::::::::{{Tq\|truly unbiased}} - That's not the goal, see [[WP:YESBIAS]]. [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie\|talk]]) 16:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)		::::::::::::::::::{{Tq\|truly unbiased}} - That's not the goal, see [[WP:YESBIAS]]. [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie\|talk]]) 16:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
			::I have no objection to adding "conservative" or "right-wing" by counting how sources describe ''The Epoch Times'' as such. At the same time, however, we are also establishing how the lead should summarize the body. Right now "far-right" is the main notable thing regarding its stance. [[User:Vacosea\|Vacosea]] ([[User talk:Vacosea\|talk]]) 23:55, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

	== Anti-vax misinformation? ==		== Anti-vax misinformation? ==