Talk:Fae Farm/GA1
GA review: 1 more ping
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 17:40, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
*::::::I'm back from editing. I'll continue again tomorrow as ive spent a couple hours alone improving this. I'm not pinging you yet as I'm not yet done, [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 21:50, 10 April 2026 (UTC) |
*::::::I'm back from editing. I'll continue again tomorrow as ive spent a couple hours alone improving this. I'm not pinging you yet as I'm not yet done, [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 21:50, 10 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
{{od}}{{ping|Z-Gamer Guys}}, after spending at least a couple hours this month alone, guess its time for you to review again. I think the sources used in the review is enough to satisfy the 'broadness' criteria as well as the 'gameplay' section, which is why I didn't include all of them (this is a GAN, not an FAC after all). I have added several new sources before and during the GAN process, [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Fae_Farm which put me #1 authorship by a wide margin.] [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 19:49, 11 April 2026 (UTC) |
{{od}}{{ping|Z-Gamer Guys}}, after spending at least a couple hours this month alone, guess its time for you to review again. I think the sources used in the review is enough to satisfy the 'broadness' criteria as well as the 'gameplay' section, which is why I didn't include all of them (this is a GAN, not an FAC after all). I have added several new sources before and during the GAN process, [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Fae_Farm which put me #1 authorship by a wide margin.] [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 19:49, 11 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
**{{ping|Z-Gamer Guys}} one more try [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 17:40, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
