Wikipedia talk:Notability

Wikipedia talk:Notability

Why isn't this a policy?: re

← Previous revision Revision as of 12:29, 21 April 2026
Line 364: Line 364:
::[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] is an entirely subjective standard, and yet it is a policy page. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 23:20, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
::[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] is an entirely subjective standard, and yet it is a policy page. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 23:20, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:::We have [[WP:GUIDES]] policy saying that exceptions can be made by using common sense, especially in certain circumstances. IAR is just... IAR, ya know, right? [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 23:47, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
:::We have [[WP:GUIDES]] policy saying that exceptions can be made by using common sense, especially in certain circumstances. IAR is just... IAR, ya know, right? [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 23:47, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
*Another answer, is primary sources may be fine for a bunch of facts but the purpose of secondary sources which is also our purpose is to put facts together in a coherent, useful way, and if we put them together they way secondary sources do, we avoid being the new arbiter of topics. [[User:Alanscottwalker|Alanscottwalker]] ([[User talk:Alanscottwalker|talk]]) 12:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC)


== RfC on [[MOS:VA]] sections ==
== RfC on [[MOS:VA]] sections ==