Talk:Incorporation of Xinjiang into the People's Republic of China
Requested move 16 April 2026: o/s1
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 20:08, 19 April 2026 | ||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
*'''Oppose'''. "People's Republic of China incorporation" and "Republic of Turkey incorporation" read very awkwardly to me. Moreover, the switch from "incorporation ... into" to "incorporation of" does not increase clarity. [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] ([[User talk:Srnec|talk]]) 19:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''. "People's Republic of China incorporation" and "Republic of Turkey incorporation" read very awkwardly to me. Moreover, the switch from "incorporation ... into" to "incorporation of" does not increase clarity. [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] ([[User talk:Srnec|talk]]) 19:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose'''. I think "Incorporation of X into (the) Y" is more natural English than "Y incorporation of X", especially when X is a long phrase like "People's Republic of China". —[[User:Mx. Granger|Mx. Granger]] ([[User talk:Mx. Granger|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Mx. Granger|contribs]]) 22:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose'''. I think "Incorporation of X into (the) Y" is more natural English than "Y incorporation of X", especially when X is a long phrase like "People's Republic of China". —[[User:Mx. Granger|Mx. Granger]] ([[User talk:Mx. Granger|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Mx. Granger|contribs]]) 22:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose the first two''', support "French incorporation of Provence". Why use the full official country names? and not just "Chinese" or "Turkish" as the other examples all use adjectives, not [[United Kingdom rule in Burma]] or [[Russian Federation invasion of Ukraine]]. If there are other incorporations (?) just use the year, although "Chinese" and "Turkish" are probably related to the primary topics of [[China]] and [[Turkey]] which these articles [[WP:CONSUB|are on about anyway]]? '''[[User:DankJae|Dank]][[User talk:DankJae|Jae]]''' 20:08, 19 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
