Talk:Ben Pasternak

Another time none of these edits are defamatory in nature

Another time none of these edits are defamatory in nature

[[User:ArceonOnCrack|ArceonOnCrack]] ([[User talk:ArceonOnCrack|talk]]) 21:48, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

[[User:ArceonOnCrack|ArceonOnCrack]] ([[User talk:ArceonOnCrack|talk]]) 21:48, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you for using the COI edit request tool, however I will decline to make those changes as, in my view, the wording is a bit [[WP:UNDUE|unduly weighted]]. Such material is liable to be reverted (i.e. removed) from the article. Good day—[[User:RetroCosmos|RetroCosmos]] ^{[[User talk:RetroCosmos|talk]]} 01:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

* '''Why it should be changed''':

* '''Why it should be changed''':

Ben Pasternak is being portrait as a good guy in his wikipedia article. If you read the article it seems like he is a trusted person and founder. This is not the case. Not only did he abandon a startup like crypto project and made his investors lose tons of money while he made 40 million dollars, but he also has a lawsuit against him and his startup. This is necessary information that should definetly be shown in the wikipedia article. To the defence of the annonymous person who deleted the edits made: I know that most sources in the crypto industry can not be trusted fully. I already tried including the best sources from sometimes multi billion companies. I acknowledge that some sources may not look 100% perfect, but these are the best I could find since Wikipedia rejects all social media sources like Twitter and Youtube where unfortuanately the case is documented the best. Also an important point is that there are some really credible sources for example by the law company itself suing Ben Pasternak and the concept of his company aswell as revenue. Also his relationship status is acknowledged by a credible source.

Ben Pasternak is being portrait as a good guy in his wikipedia article. If you read the article it seems like he is a trusted person and founder. This is not the case. Not only did he abandon a startup like crypto project and made his investors lose tons of money while he made 40 million dollars, but he also has a lawsuit against him and his startup. This is necessary information that should definetly be shown in the wikipedia article. To the defence of the annonymous person who deleted the edits made: I know that most sources in the crypto industry can not be trusted fully. I already tried including the best sources from sometimes multi billion companies. I acknowledge that some sources may not look 100% perfect, but these are the best I could find since Wikipedia rejects all social media sources like Twitter and Youtube where unfortuanately the case is documented the best. Also an important point is that there are some really credible sources for example by the law company itself suing Ben Pasternak and the concept of his company aswell as revenue. Also his relationship status is acknowledged by a credible source.