Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Dandotiya

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Dandotiya

AfD Rajesh Dandotiya

← Previous revision Revision as of 21:24, 26 April 2026
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Speedy Keep''' SK1 no valid rationale provided for the AfD nomination. To get the history right, it was declined at AfC on Nov 23rd 2025 by [[User:Guninvalid|Guninvalid]]. After this [[User:Aaaddiil]] edited it then moved it to main which was perhaps not best, but is not against policy. (They have just been blocked, but that is not relevant to this AfD.) Since that date it has been edited by 8 authors. The page was reviewed at [[WP:NPP|NPP]] by an experience editor on Feb 16th, and the reviewer [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] commented that they felt the page had proven notability. After that it was PROD'd with accusations of {{tq|No sigcov, likely AI, possibly UPE}} by [[User:Aesurias|Aesurias]] for which zero evidence was provided. Since I saw no evidence in the current version of LLM, and no evidence of UPE has been provided, I unPROD'd it (with a typo "AfC reviewer" which should have been "NPP reviewer"). Since the page has already passed NPP as notable, re-draftication is not appropriate, particularly as the nom has no offered any evidence for current problems or rationale beyond their declination 5 months ago.[[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 20:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Keep''' SK1 no valid rationale provided for the AfD nomination. To get the history right, it was declined at AfC on Nov 23rd 2025 by [[User:Guninvalid|Guninvalid]]. After this [[User:Aaaddiil]] edited it then moved it to main which was perhaps not best, but is not against policy. (They have just been blocked, but that is not relevant to this AfD.) Since that date it has been edited by 8 authors. The page was reviewed at [[WP:NPP|NPP]] by an experience editor on Feb 16th, and the reviewer [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] commented that they felt the page had proven notability. After that it was PROD'd with accusations of {{tq|No sigcov, likely AI, possibly UPE}} by [[User:Aesurias|Aesurias]] for which zero evidence was provided. Since I saw no evidence in the current version of LLM, and no evidence of UPE has been provided, I unPROD'd it (with a typo "AfC reviewer" which should have been "NPP reviewer"). Since the page has already passed NPP as notable, re-draftication is not appropriate, particularly as the nom has no offered any evidence for current problems or rationale beyond their declination 5 months ago.[[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 20:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
*Note: this discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|AfD sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|Authors]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Police|Police]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Madhya Pradesh|Madhya Pradesh]]. [[User:Spiderone|Spiderone]][[User talk:Spiderone|(Talk to Spider)]] 21:19, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
*Note: this discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|AfD sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|Authors]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Police|Police]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Madhya Pradesh|Madhya Pradesh]]. [[User:Spiderone|Spiderone]][[User talk:Spiderone|(Talk to Spider)]] 21:19, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' for [[Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup|AfD is not cleanup]]. I respect your position @[[User:guninvalid|guninvalid]] ([[User_Talk:guninvalid|talk]]), but this is really not needed. The article can be further improved while being in mainspace. [[User:MitYehor|MitYehor📘^]][[User talk:MitYehor|talk]] 21:23, 26 April 2026 (UTC)