Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Kihlbom (2nd nomination)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Kihlbom (2nd nomination)

-pluperfect

← Previous revision Revision as of 07:29, 20 April 2026
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Weak keep'''. The article was recently kept at AfD earlier in 2026 and no substantially new evidence has been presented to overturn that consensus. While coverage appears limited participation in UCI World Championships and existence of some independent sources suggest borderline notability. At minimum, no consensus for deletion.[[User:EditorTimes|EditorTimes]] ([[User talk:EditorTimes|talk]]) 01:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep'''. The article was recently kept at AfD earlier in 2026 and no substantially new evidence has been presented to overturn that consensus. While coverage appears limited participation in UCI World Championships and existence of some independent sources suggest borderline notability. At minimum, no consensus for deletion.[[User:EditorTimes|EditorTimes]] ([[User talk:EditorTimes|talk]]) 01:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)


* '''Delete''' - I believe the argument that it was kept at AfD, without source analysis, is erroneous. The article was kept on the grounds of these three sources, that were presented by Geschichte, but that Geschichte declined to enter a !vote over. There were then two "keep" votes "per Geschichte's sources/assessment", that didn't notice they had declined to provide any such assessment. That AfD result lacks rigour, and the nom. had reviewed the sources and claims those sources are "primarily mentions" (which is also not rigorous, but does address them). The sources are:
* '''Delete''' - I believe the argument that it was kept at AfD, without source analysis, is erroneous. The article was kept on the grounds of these three sources, that were presented by Geschichte, but that Geschichte declined to enter a !vote over. There were then two "keep" votes "per Geschichte's sources/assessment", that didn't notice they had declined to provide any such assessment. That AfD result lacks rigour, and the nom. reviewed the sources and claims those sources are "primarily mentions" (which is also not rigorous, but does address them). The sources are:
# [https://www.bt.se/sport/valde-bort-karriaren-for-systerns-sista-tid/] and [https://www.bt.se/sport/jessica-kihlbom-uttagen-till-vm/] from Borås Tidning, the leading local newspaper for the Sjuhärad region. Treated together as multiple articles from a single publication are a single source when considered for notability. These articles have some biographical depth. They are written from interviews, but are not wholly an interview. But they are, without a doubt, local reporting in a local newspaper. The second is occasioned by her selection to a team. The first, which is the more recent, tells us that the professional door was shut and she is not competing. It's not nothing, but GNG requires multiple sources for a reason, and here the information is a local interest story. This doesn't, for me, show ''any'' notability of the subject and has independence issues. It does provide a little biographical detail, but that's all. {{hmm}}
# [https://www.bt.se/sport/valde-bort-karriaren-for-systerns-sista-tid/] and [https://www.bt.se/sport/jessica-kihlbom-uttagen-till-vm/] from Borås Tidning, the leading local newspaper for the Sjuhärad region. Treated together as multiple articles from a single publication are a single source when considered for notability. These articles have some biographical depth. They are written from interviews, but are not wholly an interview. But they are, without a doubt, local reporting in a local newspaper. The second is occasioned by her selection to a team. The first, which is the more recent, tells us that the professional door was shut and she is not competing. It's not nothing, but GNG requires multiple sources for a reason, and here the information is a local interest story. This doesn't, for me, show ''any'' notability of the subject and has independence issues. It does provide a little biographical detail, but that's all. {{hmm}}
# [https://www.gp.se/sport/proffslaget-dar-ingen-ar-avlonad.455374be-8ad2-4b32-a5a0-81ad545da17c] from Göteborgs-Posten, Sweden's largest daily newspaper, but all we have is an article about a team with a sentence telling us she is a team member and then providing a very short quote from her. Not SIGCOV, and the quite is not independent of the subject. {{nay}} Also note that this article sits chronologically between the two above{{pb}}The source given by the IP is also primary {{nay}}, so this clearly does not meet [[WP:GNG]] and we don't have any reason to presume notability. She appears to have quite cycling by 2014, without any significant success, merely competing in one tier one race. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 07:28, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
# [https://www.gp.se/sport/proffslaget-dar-ingen-ar-avlonad.455374be-8ad2-4b32-a5a0-81ad545da17c] from Göteborgs-Posten, Sweden's largest daily newspaper, but all we have is an article about a team with a sentence telling us she is a team member and then providing a very short quote from her. Not SIGCOV, and the quite is not independent of the subject. {{nay}} Also note that this article sits chronologically between the two above{{pb}}The source given by the IP is also primary {{nay}}, so this clearly does not meet [[WP:GNG]] and we don't have any reason to presume notability. She appears to have quite cycling by 2014, without any significant success, merely competing in one tier one race. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 07:28, 20 April 2026 (UTC)