Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger on Midnight River
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 01:04, 20 April 2026 | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{la|1=Danger on Midnight River}} – ( |
:{{la|1=Danger on Midnight River}} – ( |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Danger on Midnight River}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Danger on Midnight River}}) |
||
Appears to fail [[WP:NBOOK]]. The only [[WP:SIGCOV]] I could find is one review for an audibook edition in School Library Journal ({{ProQuest|211687162}}). The reference currently in the article is to a reliable source, but appears to mostly just list titles with a short summary ([https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_100_Most_Popular_Young_Adult_Authors/jOTEEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=The%20100%20most%20popular%20young%20adult%20authors%3A%20biographical%20sketches%20and%20bibliographies.&pg=PA397&printsec=frontcover Google Books link]), so fine for [[WP:V]] but nothing that contributes to notability. |
Appears to fail [[WP:NBOOK]]. The only [[WP:SIGCOV]] I could find is one review for an audibook edition in School Library Journal ({{ProQuest|211687162}}). The reference currently in the article is to a reliable source, but appears to mostly just list titles with a short summary ([https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_100_Most_Popular_Young_Adult_Authors/jOTEEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=The%20100%20most%20popular%20young%20adult%20authors%3A%20biographical%20sketches%20and%20bibliographies.&pg=PA397&printsec=frontcover Google Books link]), so fine for [[WP:V]] but nothing that contributes to notability. |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Comment''': I found two sort-of reviews [https://www.newspapers.com/image/1176176745/?match=1&terms=%22Danger%20on%20Midnight%20River%22%20Paulsen here] and [https://www.newspapers.com/image/961323818/?match=1&terms=%22Danger%20on%20Midnight%20River%22%20Paulsen here], but they are extremely capsule reviews. They make the PW and SLJ reviews look meaty. If the other books in the series have the same level of coverage then I'd heavily recommend a series page. This is pretty much the epitome of something that will never really be super lengthy and we could cover pretty much the same amount of content in a single page much more efficiently. I'll try to get around to making one, but life has been hectic this year to say the least. [[User:ReaderofthePack|ReaderofthePack]](formerly Tokyogirl79)[[User talk:ReaderofthePack|''' (｡◕‿◕｡)''']] 00:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''': I found two sort-of reviews [https://www.newspapers.com/image/1176176745/?match=1&terms=%22Danger%20on%20Midnight%20River%22%20Paulsen here] and [https://www.newspapers.com/image/961323818/?match=1&terms=%22Danger%20on%20Midnight%20River%22%20Paulsen here], but they are extremely capsule reviews. They make the PW and SLJ reviews look meaty. If the other books in the series have the same level of coverage then I'd heavily recommend a series page. This is pretty much the epitome of something that will never really be super lengthy and we could cover pretty much the same amount of content in a single page much more efficiently. I'll try to get around to making one, but life has been hectic this year to say the least. [[User:ReaderofthePack|ReaderofthePack]](formerly Tokyogirl79)[[User talk:ReaderofthePack|''' (｡◕‿◕｡)''']] 00:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
* '''Redirect''' to author. Even as a defender of Kirkus as sigcov, those additional capsule reviews are just too brief for me. A series article would be great too but in the mean time a redirect to the author seems like it would serve readers best. [[User:LEvalyn|~ le 🌸 valyn]] ([[User talk:LEvalyn|talk]]) 07:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC) |
* '''Redirect''' to author. Even as a defender of Kirkus as sigcov, those additional capsule reviews are just too brief for me. A series article would be great too but in the mean time a redirect to the author seems like it would serve readers best. [[User:LEvalyn|~ le 🌸 valyn]] ([[User talk:LEvalyn|talk]]) 07:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
: '''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}''' Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Svartner|Svartner]] ([[User talk:Svartner|talk]]) 01:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
