Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Jakob (2nd nomination)

* Nominator has less than 5 edits and is likely a sockpuppet, as this biography is apparently a lightning rod for the sockpuppet wars. First participant in this AfD has less than 300 edits with proportionally high recent participation at AfD. Likely all participants in the last AfD from a year ago (which I regret closing) turned out to be sockpuppets as well and two were recently banned. The facts about her personal life attributed to ''Daily Telegraph'' (Australia) which is classified as unreliable per [[WP:NPRSG]]) have been removed per [[WP:BLP]]. The other low-quality sources (''Portugal News'' and ''Baltic Times'') and associated claims have been removed as well. [[User:Cielquiparle|Cielquiparle]] ([[User talk:Cielquiparle|talk]]) 06:52, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

* Nominator has less than 5 edits and is likely a sockpuppet, as this biography is apparently a lightning rod for the sockpuppet wars. First participant in this AfD has less than 300 edits with proportionally high recent participation at AfD. Likely all participants in the last AfD from a year ago (which I regret closing) turned out to be sockpuppets as well and two were recently banned. The facts about her personal life attributed to ''Daily Telegraph'' (Australia) which is classified as unreliable per [[WP:NPRSG]]) have been removed per [[WP:BLP]]. The other low-quality sources (''Portugal News'' and ''Baltic Times'') and associated claims have been removed as well. [[User:Cielquiparle|Cielquiparle]] ([[User talk:Cielquiparle|talk]]) 06:52, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

*:'''Response'''. Is this an objection or a comment? Also, per [[WP:AFD4]] I'd like to think my contribution can be seen as a good faith attempt at discussion; your comment on my edit count and recent activity insinuates that this may not be the case. [[User:Harryb7|Harryb7]] ([[User talk:Harryb7|talk]]) 12:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

*:'''Response'''. Is this an objection or a comment? Also, per [[WP:AFD4]] I'd like to think my contribution can be seen as a good faith attempt at discussion; your comment on my edit count and recent activity insinuates that this may not be the case. [[User:Harryb7|Harryb7]] ([[User talk:Harryb7|talk]]) 12:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

*::@[[User:Cielquiparle|Cielquiparle]] I agree with your initial observation. The pattern you noted at the outset is now further reflected by additional low-edit accounts such as [[User:GarciaH1978|GarciaH1978]] participating in this AfD. I’ve opened a sockpuppet investigation (SPI) to allow a formal review of any potential connections. [[User:Picksbirds|Picksbirds]] ([[User talk:Picksbirds|talk]]) 03:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

*'''Speedy Keep'''. Per WP:AFDREPEAT and Tainted nomination, an article which survived a prior AfD should not be renominated unless there is significant new evidence. The nominator has given reason sourcing quality, coverage focus which are as same as those raised in the first nomination. Also, Cielquiparle has already taken corrective action on WP:BLP and sourcing issues directly in the article, the appropriate remedy for article-quality problems. Notably, the nominator themselves has less than 5 edits, raising serious questions about the good faith of this nomination per WP:NOTHERE. The nominator seems angry that there is no article for Gabriel Jakob which is completely irrelevant. Seeing court case going on between Alexandra and Gabriel this AFD seems like planned [[WP:ATTACK]] too. The complaint about non-admin closure is a red herring. WP:NAC explicitly validates such closures. If the prior result was genuinely tainted, WP:DRV was the correct remedy. [[User:Picksbirds|Picksbirds]] ([[User talk:Picksbirds|talk]]) 12:11, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

*'''Speedy Keep'''. Per WP:AFDREPEAT and Tainted nomination, an article which survived a prior AfD should not be renominated unless there is significant new evidence. The nominator has given reason sourcing quality, coverage focus which are as same as those raised in the first nomination. Also, Cielquiparle has already taken corrective action on WP:BLP and sourcing issues directly in the article, the appropriate remedy for article-quality problems. Notably, the nominator themselves has less than 5 edits, raising serious questions about the good faith of this nomination per WP:NOTHERE. The nominator seems angry that there is no article for Gabriel Jakob which is completely irrelevant. Seeing court case going on between Alexandra and Gabriel this AFD seems like planned [[WP:ATTACK]] too. The complaint about non-admin closure is a red herring. WP:NAC explicitly validates such closures. If the prior result was genuinely tainted, WP:DRV was the correct remedy. [[User:Picksbirds|Picksbirds]] ([[User talk:Picksbirds|talk]]) 12:11, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

*Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/Rescue list|list of content for rescue consideration]]. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 22:40, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

*Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/Rescue list|list of content for rescue consideration]]. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 22:40, 22 April 2026 (UTC)