Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry
Magnesium and nub: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 20:15, 23 April 2026 | ||
| Line 305: | Line 305: | ||
::responding to the valid claim on some systematic symbols conflicting with non-systematic ones: i think the nil-padding takes care of that. [[User:Oreocooke|User "Oreocooke"]] ([[User talk:Oreocooke|speak of the sun]] [[Special:Contributions/Oreocooke|and it shines]]) 19:56, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
::responding to the valid claim on some systematic symbols conflicting with non-systematic ones: i think the nil-padding takes care of that. [[User:Oreocooke|User "Oreocooke"]] ([[User talk:Oreocooke|speak of the sun]] [[Special:Contributions/Oreocooke|and it shines]]) 19:56, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:Just delete that entry, it is not a thing. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 20:10, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
:Just delete that entry, it is not a thing. [[User:Johnjbarton|Johnjbarton]] ([[User talk:Johnjbarton|talk]]) 20:10, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:The assumption is that any systematic name for an element would be three digits, so there would be no overlap with existing symbols. Boron is Nnp, Helium is Nnb, Phosphorus is Nup... Thus the need for 0 as nil. -- [[User:Reconrabbit|Recon]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|rabbit]] 20:15, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
