User:Uhoj/sandbox
←Replaced content with '{{User sandbox}} '
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 19:52, 22 April 2026 | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User sandbox}} |
{{User sandbox}} |
||
Point two of the [[WP:CRITICISM|criticism essay]] says:{{Blockquote|text=Do not present the material in a way that emphasizes beyond the emphasis given in reliable sources.}} |
|||
That's essentially a restatement of our policy on [[WP:BALASP|balancing aspects]], so it's worth looking at where emphasis is placed in sources that provide overviews of this topic. |
|||
[https://www.britannica.com/technology/ChatGPT Britannica's take] |
|||
* Software that responds to questions using natural language |
|||
* Disturbing to academics and journalists because it generates text that passes as human |
|||
* Based on a probability model constructed by processing large quantities of existing text |
|||
* Underlying technology is neural networks |
|||
* Was interpreted as a dramatic advance in AI when introduced |
|||
* User base grew rapidly |
|||
* Concern that students could use it to cheat |
|||
* Good at written composition; bad at math |
|||
* Hallucinates like other LLMs |
|||
* Fails to admit when it doesn't know an answer |
|||
