User:FluffyKabu/Shinto shrine/Beige Blanket Peer Review
Wrote my Review
New page
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org peer review/guide}}
==General info==
;Whose work are you reviewing?
FluffyKabu
;Link to draft you're reviewing
;[[User:FluffyKabu/Shinto shrine]]
;Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
[[Shinto shrine]]
== Evaluate the drafted changes ==
'''Content:''' The content is strong, focusing on the "State Integration" of the Shinto in the Ritsuryo and Heian periods. It gave a brief overview of the various codes and revisions that matched them. The examples given of rituals were informative, but two of the rituals are missing links and I believe that it would be better if rituals with separate Wikipedia pages would be stronger to include.
'''Tone/Balance:''' The tone is in an informative tone, with the balance being strong, and the information having little to no biases or a positive/negative tone.
'''Sourcing/References:''' The sourcing is strong, with all relevant information being sourced correctly and the links working correctly. It was impressive with how well-sourced everything was.
'''Overall Impressions:''' This page is very well-written and well organized. I honestly have no real feedback on this page other than maybe to choose rituals which include Wikipedia pages and can be more informative. Well done!'''
'''
==General info==
;Whose work are you reviewing?
FluffyKabu
;Link to draft you're reviewing
;[[User:FluffyKabu/Shinto shrine]]
;Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
[[Shinto shrine]]
== Evaluate the drafted changes ==
'''Content:''' The content is strong, focusing on the "State Integration" of the Shinto in the Ritsuryo and Heian periods. It gave a brief overview of the various codes and revisions that matched them. The examples given of rituals were informative, but two of the rituals are missing links and I believe that it would be better if rituals with separate Wikipedia pages would be stronger to include.
'''Tone/Balance:''' The tone is in an informative tone, with the balance being strong, and the information having little to no biases or a positive/negative tone.
'''Sourcing/References:''' The sourcing is strong, with all relevant information being sourced correctly and the links working correctly. It was impressive with how well-sourced everything was.
'''Overall Impressions:''' This page is very well-written and well organized. I honestly have no real feedback on this page other than maybe to choose rituals which include Wikipedia pages and can be more informative. Well done!'''
'''
