User:Claireanais/Evaluate an Article
I completed the sandbox prompt and evaluated another Wikipedia article utilizing the guidelines provided.
New page
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org evaluate article/guide}}
== Which article are you evaluating? ==
[[Mexican folk dance]]
== Why you have chosen this article to evaluate? ==
I chose to evaluate this article for my sandbox practice because I am a folklórico dancer myself. I have been dancing folklórico for 3 years now, and I can attest to most of the information in this article. Besides my personal connection with Mexican folk dance, I believe it is important for cultural awareness and dissemination, considering half of the United States was once México. Based off of my preliminary impression, I thought the article was well written with attention to detail! The article reserved a neutral tone and most of the information presented was supported by evidence, though I did not review the sources in-depth. sources in depth.
== Evaluate the article ==
* Lead Section
The lead section does a sufficient job introducing the topic with the first two sentences, however it does not accurately sum up the article. There is only one paragraph in the lead section, it would be better if there were another paragraph explaining the history and sections more concisely.
* Content
The content of the article, for the most part, is well-developed and detailed. The history section does a good job of giving a summarized timeline of Mexican folk dance beginning with pre-Hispanic times. It introduces a variety of influential groups ranging from indigenous communities, Spanish Conquistadors, and members of the Mexican Revolution. The diversity section is a perfect segue from the history section and explains the different dancing styles and aspects with each region. This section also does a good job using information from the history section and intertwining it with the new material. The Ballet Folklórico de México section is a great to talk about the widespread popularity of folklórico. However, there should either be an expansion or a new section covering the dissemination of Mexican folklórico in the United States, as the art form is still present and practiced in a majority of the southwestern states. The different sections covering the multitude of folklórico regions is underdeveloped. There is missing information about the music and style of the costumes, which is important to understanding the complexity and uniqueness of each region. There are some regions that are left out entirely.
* Tone and Balance
The tone of the article maintains the neutral tone that is expected of Wikipedia articles. The tone is informative and professional, delivering the information accurately and without bias. There is an imbalance of information with the different regions of México. Some talk about specific dances and go in-depth of the history of the dance and briefly talk about the music and instruments, or vice versa.
* Sources and References
Some of the links do not take me to the source, which would need to be fixed. Besides that, there is a variety of sources ranging from news articles, journals, or manuscripts. The article could benefit from more research-related articles. Most information from the article is given a citation and supported. I appreciate how some of the sources come from experts and professionals in the field.
* Organization and writing quality
The article is well written and organized, allowing for readers to understand and follow the content easily. There is also cohesion of the information and the sections, which supports the integrity and clarity of the article.
* Images and Media
All images are laid out efficiently and support the sections in which they are placed. The images also capture and represent the information in which it is related to, and there are no issues with the quality. It appears that all images comply with Wikipedia's copyright policies.
* Talk Page
The article's talk page only contains three messages about citations. There is one message that asks for more clarification on a spelling issue. The article is given a B rating.(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)
== Which article are you evaluating? ==
[[Mexican folk dance]]
== Why you have chosen this article to evaluate? ==
I chose to evaluate this article for my sandbox practice because I am a folklórico dancer myself. I have been dancing folklórico for 3 years now, and I can attest to most of the information in this article. Besides my personal connection with Mexican folk dance, I believe it is important for cultural awareness and dissemination, considering half of the United States was once México. Based off of my preliminary impression, I thought the article was well written with attention to detail! The article reserved a neutral tone and most of the information presented was supported by evidence, though I did not review the sources in-depth. sources in depth.
== Evaluate the article ==
* Lead Section
The lead section does a sufficient job introducing the topic with the first two sentences, however it does not accurately sum up the article. There is only one paragraph in the lead section, it would be better if there were another paragraph explaining the history and sections more concisely.
* Content
The content of the article, for the most part, is well-developed and detailed. The history section does a good job of giving a summarized timeline of Mexican folk dance beginning with pre-Hispanic times. It introduces a variety of influential groups ranging from indigenous communities, Spanish Conquistadors, and members of the Mexican Revolution. The diversity section is a perfect segue from the history section and explains the different dancing styles and aspects with each region. This section also does a good job using information from the history section and intertwining it with the new material. The Ballet Folklórico de México section is a great to talk about the widespread popularity of folklórico. However, there should either be an expansion or a new section covering the dissemination of Mexican folklórico in the United States, as the art form is still present and practiced in a majority of the southwestern states. The different sections covering the multitude of folklórico regions is underdeveloped. There is missing information about the music and style of the costumes, which is important to understanding the complexity and uniqueness of each region. There are some regions that are left out entirely.
* Tone and Balance
The tone of the article maintains the neutral tone that is expected of Wikipedia articles. The tone is informative and professional, delivering the information accurately and without bias. There is an imbalance of information with the different regions of México. Some talk about specific dances and go in-depth of the history of the dance and briefly talk about the music and instruments, or vice versa.
* Sources and References
Some of the links do not take me to the source, which would need to be fixed. Besides that, there is a variety of sources ranging from news articles, journals, or manuscripts. The article could benefit from more research-related articles. Most information from the article is given a citation and supported. I appreciate how some of the sources come from experts and professionals in the field.
* Organization and writing quality
The article is well written and organized, allowing for readers to understand and follow the content easily. There is also cohesion of the information and the sections, which supports the integrity and clarity of the article.
* Images and Media
All images are laid out efficiently and support the sections in which they are placed. The images also capture and represent the information in which it is related to, and there are no issues with the quality. It appears that all images comply with Wikipedia's copyright policies.
* Talk Page
The article's talk page only contains three messages about citations. There is one message that asks for more clarification on a spelling issue. The article is given a B rating.(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)
