User talk:Slatersteven

== Your revert on Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran ==

== Your revert on Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran ==

{{disdis|Razgura}}

Hi--

Could you explain your revert? Is it because of content or unclear wording?

If it's because of content, it's backed up by the sources and should remain, if it's because of wording it can be fixed. Thank you [[User:Razgura|Razgura]] ([[User talk:Razgura|talk]]) 14:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

:The place for this discussion is the article talk page, and my edit summary explains my objection. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven#top|talk]]) 14:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

:The place for this discussion is the article talk page, and my edit summary explains my objection. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven#top|talk]]) 14:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

::Slatersteven, I find your response contradictory and severely lacking in internal consistency. During our previous discussion regarding the [[Satanic panic]] article, you left a thread on my user talk page regarding the dispute. This is despite the fact that on the satanic panic talk page, there is no recent and non-archived discussion. During the discussion on my user page, I repeatedly suggested creating a thread on the satanic panic talk page. While you are under no obligation to do this, this is a typical process for dispute resolution and is required. You stated "As to why here, becasue I am talking about Your actions." How does this rationale not apply to this thread? Either you have a problem with people reaching out regarding disputes on talk pages, or you don't. I will assume good faith, but this gives the appearance of someone who objects to other people contacting them on their personal talk page, but has no problem doing the same to other users. I humbly ask that you reflect on this dichotomy And basically " pick a side".

::Slatersteven, I find your response contradictory and severely lacking in internal consistency. During our previous discussion regarding the [[Satanic panic]] article, you left a thread on my user talk page regarding the dispute. This is despite the fact that on the satanic panic talk page, there is no recent and non-archived discussion. During the discussion on my user page, I repeatedly suggested creating a thread on the satanic panic talk page. While you are under no obligation to do this, this is a typical process for dispute resolution and is required. You stated "As to why here, becasue I am talking about Your actions." How does this rationale not apply to this thread? Either you have a problem with people reaching out regarding disputes on talk pages, or you don't. I will assume good faith, but this gives the appearance of someone who objects to other people contacting them on their personal talk page, but has no problem doing the same to other users. I humbly ask that you reflect on this dichotomy And basically " pick a side".