User talk:ScalarFactor
Draft:Ktaadn: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 20:34, 23 April 2026 | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Hi @[[User:ScalarFactor|ScalarFactor]], I saw that my new article was declined due to suspected AI usage. I didn't use AI to write my text and was wondering why it was suspected of it and how I can not run into this issue in the future? Thank you for any feedback you can give me. [[User:JkWells|JkWells]] ([[User talk:JkWells|talk]]) 20:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
Hi @[[User:ScalarFactor|ScalarFactor]], I saw that my new article was declined due to suspected AI usage. I didn't use AI to write my text and was wondering why it was suspected of it and how I can not run into this issue in the future? Thank you for any feedback you can give me. [[User:JkWells|JkWells]] ([[User talk:JkWells|talk]]) 20:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:Hi @[[User:JkWells|JkWells]], I didn't believe there to be any one "smoking gun", but there were some indicators in the text such as [[WP:AIVOCAB]] like the use of "highlight" and "emphasizing". Additionally, citing statements such as {{tq|According to literary critics}} or {{tq|Some critics view}} to only one source is a [[WP:AIWEASEL|a "weasel word"]] sort of attribution. |
|||
:If you did not use a LLM to generate this text, I would highly recommend citing online copies of the works if at all possible through JSTOR or DOIs, using specific page numbers. [[User:ScalarFactor|ScalarFactor]] ([[User talk:ScalarFactor#top|talk]]) 20:34, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
