User talk:Phlogiston Enthusiast
Question from Joscovit (17:55, 27 April 2026): Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 19:00, 27 April 2026 | ||
| Line 502: | Line 502: | ||
::But I lived it, know it, know the confidential sides. Too bad, but I will defer. Do not want a RICO act assessed however. Bona fide data. IMO. [[User:Joscovit|Joscovit]] ([[User talk:Joscovit|talk]]) 18:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC) |
::But I lived it, know it, know the confidential sides. Too bad, but I will defer. Do not want a RICO act assessed however. Bona fide data. IMO. [[User:Joscovit|Joscovit]] ([[User talk:Joscovit|talk]]) 18:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::If you cannot provide a verifiable source, don't add the information. Thanks. ([[User talk:Phlogiston Enthusiast|Talk]]) [[User:Phlogiston Enthusiast|PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST]] 18:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC) |
:::If you cannot provide a verifiable source, don't add the information. Thanks. ([[User talk:Phlogiston Enthusiast|Talk]]) [[User:Phlogiston Enthusiast|PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST]] 18:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::::But you fail to see the question. You do not understand that I AM THE SOURCE. Period. Maybe two or three others, but many dead. You do not seem to understand. You cannot outsource my source base. I demand fair and equal treatment in these matters as a source. Sorry. Please rethink your thoughts. I can provide the data, and I am mostly the source, few if any collaborators. I can |
|||
::::testify under oath by affidavit. Some I lived through, some I discovered, some I researched, some I reported to others. Was also at DOD & NARA. I do not invent source data. You must double check any data I furnish on JFK matters. But do not ipso facto challenge me as a reliable or semi-reliable source. That is not fair or productive. I can only tell what I factually know. I would not furnish guesses or gossip or estimates or speculations. I assure you. (JS) [[User:Joscovit|Joscovit]] ([[User talk:Joscovit|talk]]) 19:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
