User talk:MandatoryAssignment
Introduction to contentious topics: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 22:58, 22 April 2026 | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
I would recommend also reviewing [[WP:ECREXPLAIN]], which goes into further detail about expectations and best practices for new editors in highly contentious topics. signed, [[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] [[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']] 21:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC) |
I would recommend also reviewing [[WP:ECREXPLAIN]], which goes into further detail about expectations and best practices for new editors in highly contentious topics. signed, [[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] [[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']] 21:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for taking the time to give me a heads-up! My apologies for the trouble. I didn't realize that the policy applied not just to pages within the topic area, but also to references to content that falls within the topic area. I do have one question. Given these restrictions, isn't the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_violence&oldid=1318923300 edit] that I manually reverted itself in violation of ECR? It was made by an IP editor. Or am I misunderstanding something? |
|||
:[[User:MandatoryAssignment|MandatoryAssignment]] ([[User talk:MandatoryAssignment#top|talk]]) 22:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
