User talk:D.Lazard
About your revert of my edit: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 16:45, 25 April 2026 | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:I certainly will not restore youe edit, since suspecting editors of misconduct is indeed a personal attack, except on Wikipodia pages devoted to misconducts ([[WP:ANI]] and [[WP:SPI]] for example). Also your edit goes also against [[WP:NOTCONDUCT]] and [[WP:AGF]], and is therefore not acceptable. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard#top|talk]]) 16:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
:I certainly will not restore youe edit, since suspecting editors of misconduct is indeed a personal attack, except on Wikipodia pages devoted to misconducts ([[WP:ANI]] and [[WP:SPI]] for example). Also your edit goes also against [[WP:NOTCONDUCT]] and [[WP:AGF]], and is therefore not acceptable. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard#top|talk]]) 16:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
::If [[Wikipedia:NOTCONDUCT]] is to be adhered to here, then how should canvassing and sockpuppetry be dealt with? There's nothing inherently wrong in consensus formed from canvassed folks or sockpuppets that has to deal with the content alone. [[User:GrinningIodize|GrinningIodize]] ([[User talk:GrinningIodize|talk]]) 16:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
::If [[Wikipedia:NOTCONDUCT]] is to be adhered to here, then how should canvassing and sockpuppetry be dealt with? There's nothing inherently wrong in consensus formed from canvassed folks or sockpuppets that has to deal with the content alone. [[User:GrinningIodize|GrinningIodize]] ([[User talk:GrinningIodize|talk]]) 16:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::You are free to open a notice at [[WP:ANI]] or at [[WP:SPI]]. Personally, I am convinced that it will have no chance of success. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard#top|talk]]) 16:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
