User talk:DanyMations
List of fragrance compounds: Reply
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 22:24, 25 April 2026 | ||
| Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
::Please read [[WP:42]] & the links in there, as well as [[WP:DUE]]. A web page listing products of a company is not an independent source. |
::Please read [[WP:42]] & the links in there, as well as [[WP:DUE]]. A web page listing products of a company is not an independent source. |
||
::In addition, please look at [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]] and [[WP:GNG]]. The existence of a chemical does not make a list of similar chemicals or the actual chemical notable. [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 19:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
::In addition, please look at [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]] and [[WP:GNG]]. The existence of a chemical does not make a list of similar chemicals or the actual chemical notable. [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 19:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:::You have to realize that these chemicals are quite trivial. They are used in a multi-billion dollar fragrance industry for perfumes, cleaning agents, foods, and much more. Thus, these chemicals are notable. |
|||
:::Also, for WP:DUE, how is it genuinely expected for someone to accurately and independently publish a list of chemicals that a company produces without seeming untrue? Is it seriously saying that if someone were to work at [[International Flavors & Fragrances|International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.]] and published a list of chemicals they know the company synthesizes, that's reliable? Or even worse, someone who doesn't work for the company walks into their labs to document each chemical and then publishes it; I bet that's super reliable... [[User:DanyMations|DanyMations]] ([[User talk:DanyMations#top|talk]]) 22:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
