Talk:Tamagotchi Plaza/GA1
reviewed, failed due to unreliable sources
New page
==GA review==
{{Good article tools}}
{{al|{{#titleparts:Tamagotchi Plaza/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Tamagotchi Plaza/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''
'''Reviewer:''' {{User|JuniperChill}} 12:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
(review is according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamagotchi_Plaza&oldid=1349949470#cite_ref-13 this revision])
Hi IngeniousPachyderm. Thank you for nominating this for GA. However, I am going to fail this article as it fails [[WP:GACR]] 2 (specifically 2b and 2c), which states that the article should be based on reliable sources. I see several unreliable sources (much of which are listed at [[WP:VG/S]], the video game version of [[WP:RSP]],) being used in the article. They are: Final Weapon, GoNintendo, Sportskeeda, Worth Playing, GamerBlades, Nintendo Soup and Nintendo Everything. Because of this, the article [[WP:OR|likely contains original research]], which should not be allowed on Wikipedia, and is definitely the case for GAs. (YouTube is fine as its a primary source about the game.)
This in turn would mean that the article deserves an 'unreliable sources' tag, which I have added. This in turn, would mean that I am allowed to quick fail this article under [[WP:QF#1]] (long way from meeting GACR#2) and [[WP:QF#3]] (has/needs cleanup tags). If you address these concerns, then you may renominate it again.
And just as another suggestion, I think the 'plot' section could be expanded a little. You may wish to consider using the [[User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter|CiteHighlighter]] tool to help you identify which sources are reliable or not. I used that to review this and a few other GAs. [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 12:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
{{Good article tools}}
'''Reviewer:''' {{User|JuniperChill}} 12:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
(review is according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tamagotchi_Plaza&oldid=1349949470#cite_ref-13 this revision])
Hi IngeniousPachyderm. Thank you for nominating this for GA. However, I am going to fail this article as it fails [[WP:GACR]] 2 (specifically 2b and 2c), which states that the article should be based on reliable sources. I see several unreliable sources (much of which are listed at [[WP:VG/S]], the video game version of [[WP:RSP]],) being used in the article. They are: Final Weapon, GoNintendo, Sportskeeda, Worth Playing, GamerBlades, Nintendo Soup and Nintendo Everything. Because of this, the article [[WP:OR|likely contains original research]], which should not be allowed on Wikipedia, and is definitely the case for GAs. (YouTube is fine as its a primary source about the game.)
This in turn would mean that the article deserves an 'unreliable sources' tag, which I have added. This in turn, would mean that I am allowed to quick fail this article under [[WP:QF#1]] (long way from meeting GACR#2) and [[WP:QF#3]] (has/needs cleanup tags). If you address these concerns, then you may renominate it again.
And just as another suggestion, I think the 'plot' section could be expanded a little. You may wish to consider using the [[User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter|CiteHighlighter]] tool to help you identify which sources are reliable or not. I used that to review this and a few other GAs. [[User:JuniperChill|JuniperChill]] ([[User talk:JuniperChill|talk]]) 12:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
