Talk:Pan Am

Apr 25, 2026 - 05:13
0 0
Talk:Pan Am

← Previous revision Revision as of 23:42, 24 April 2026
Line 52: Line 52:
|algo = old(30d)
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Pan Am/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Pan Am/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Old merge
| otherpage = Pan Am (1996–1998)
| discuss = Talk:Pan_Am#Merge_proposal
}}
}}


Line 69: Line 73:


== Merge proposal ==
== Merge proposal ==
{{Archive top
|result = After discarding SPA comment there appears to be virtually no interest in this merger. If the other articles are not notable they should be taken to AFD. NotBartEhrman ([[User talk:NotBartEhrman|talk]]) 23:42, 24 April 2026 (UTC) }}
I propose merging [[Pan Am (1996–1998)]] and [[Pan Am (1998–2004)]] into [[Pan Am]]. Both pages are poorly sourced with Pan am II only having 4 sources total with only 2 of them being considered “reliable” per [[WP:RS]]. Pan am III has no reliable sources and only archived images that are used as “research”. I could find no reliable sources of these companies other than blogs and mentions of them in articles about the upcoming Pan Am (see [[wp:INDEPENDENT]]). I propose that the content from these pages be added to an “attempted revivals” section of this page. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fife SB|Fife SB]] ([[User talk:Fife SB#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fife SB|contribs]]) 16:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging [[Pan Am (1996–1998)]] and [[Pan Am (1998–2004)]] into [[Pan Am]]. Both pages are poorly sourced with Pan am II only having 4 sources total with only 2 of them being considered “reliable” per [[WP:RS]]. Pan am III has no reliable sources and only archived images that are used as “research”. I could find no reliable sources of these companies other than blogs and mentions of them in articles about the upcoming Pan Am (see [[wp:INDEPENDENT]]). I propose that the content from these pages be added to an “attempted revivals” section of this page. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fife SB|Fife SB]] ([[User talk:Fife SB#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fife SB|contribs]]) 16:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)


Line 83: Line 89:
:::Maybe not the same, but close enough to where no harm would be done merging all three. [[User:Relton66|Relton66]] ([[User talk:Relton66|talk]]) 03:47, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Maybe not the same, but close enough to where no harm would be done merging all three. [[User:Relton66|Relton66]] ([[User talk:Relton66|talk]]) 03:47, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
::::They are "close enough" only in name. The appropriate way to handle this is with a disambiguation note at the top of the article, which is already the case here. '''Oppose'''.[[User:Tcr25|—Carter (Tcr25)]] ([[User talk:Tcr25|talk]]) 12:39, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
::::They are "close enough" only in name. The appropriate way to handle this is with a disambiguation note at the top of the article, which is already the case here. '''Oppose'''.[[User:Tcr25|—Carter (Tcr25)]] ([[User talk:Tcr25|talk]]) 12:39, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}
Read More