Talk:Kunal Kamra

Apr 25, 2026 - 07:16
0 0
Talk:Kunal Kamra

Proposed merge of Kunal Kamra v. Union of India into Kunal Kamra: close as no consensus to merge

← Previous revision Revision as of 01:44, 25 April 2026
Line 104: Line 104:


== Proposed merge of [[Kunal Kamra v. Union of India]] into [[Kunal Kamra]] ==
== Proposed merge of [[Kunal Kamra v. Union of India]] into [[Kunal Kamra]] ==
{{atop|No consensus to merge. '''[[User:Thebiguglyalien|Thebiguglyalien]]''' ([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|talk]]) 01:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)}}

Primary page has enough to cover the incident. I see no need of separate page. [[User:SaTnamZIN|SatnaamIN]] ([[User talk:SaTnamZIN|talk]]) 00:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Primary page has enough to cover the incident. I see no need of separate page. [[User:SaTnamZIN|SatnaamIN]] ([[User talk:SaTnamZIN|talk]]) 00:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)


Line 111: Line 111:
::I am not good at merging. Probably an expert hand is needed here. [[User:SaTnamZIN|SatnaamIN]] ([[User talk:SaTnamZIN|talk]]) 00:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
::I am not good at merging. Probably an expert hand is needed here. [[User:SaTnamZIN|SatnaamIN]] ([[User talk:SaTnamZIN|talk]]) 00:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' The case page is focused more on the legal principles, judgement, and relevance of the case to the legal jurisprudence of India – quite independent of the notability of the defendent in the case. I'd suggest including a brief snippet in the page of [[Kunal Kamra]] and then linking to the case page instead of merging. [[User:WeWake|WeWake]] ([[User talk:WeWake|talk]]) 22:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' The case page is focused more on the legal principles, judgement, and relevance of the case to the legal jurisprudence of India – quite independent of the notability of the defendent in the case. I'd suggest including a brief snippet in the page of [[Kunal Kamra]] and then linking to the case page instead of merging. [[User:WeWake|WeWake]] ([[User talk:WeWake|talk]]) 22:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
{{abot}}
Read More