Talk:Grand Theft Auto VI/Archive 2
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 08:12, 21 April 2026 | ||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
:::I read it. I still don't see a reason to remove them. [[User:GSK|GSK]] ([[User_talk:GSK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GSK|edits]]) 12:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC) |
:::I read it. I still don't see a reason to remove them. [[User:GSK|GSK]] ([[User_talk:GSK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GSK|edits]]) 12:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC) |
||
::::{{user|GSK}} It's the second and third paragraphs: |
::::{{user|GSK}} It's the second and third paragraphs: |
||
:::: Each categorized page should be placed only in the {{em|most specific}} categories to which it logically belongs, and [[#SUBCAT|subcategories]] should be categorized under only the {{em|most specific}} [[#PARENTCAT|parent categories]] possible. |
:::: Each categorized page should be placed only in the {{em|most specific}} categories to which it logically belongs, and [[#SUBCAT|subcategories]] should be categorized under only the {{em|most specific}} [[#PARENTCAT|parent categories]] possible. |
||
::::{{Bang}}{{hair space}}'''Important:''' All categories form part of a [[#Category tree organization|tree-like hierarchy]]. Do not add categories to pages as if they are [[Tag (metadata)|tags]]. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-13653-92|~2026-13653-92]] ([[User talk:~2026-13653-92|talk]]) 12:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC) |
:::: |
||
:::::Like I said, I'm aware of what the page says. To be honest, I think you're taking it too literally. These types of categories being included in these types of pages has been standard practice for a very long time, and there's really no harm in including these categories to begin with. [[User:GSK|GSK]] ([[User_talk:GSK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GSK|edits]]) 12:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC) |
:::::Like I said, I'm aware of what the page says. To be honest, I think you're taking it too literally. These types of categories being included in these types of pages has been standard practice for a very long time, and there's really no harm in including these categories to begin with. [[User:GSK|GSK]] ([[User_talk:GSK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GSK|edits]]) 12:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC) |
||
::::::{{user|GSK}} What do you mean when you say "too literally"? It's stated pretty clearly in the text I've just quoted to you, later on under [[WP:SUBCAT]] ("Pages (and subcategories) should not usually be placed in both a given category and any of its subcategories or parent categories. For some exceptions to this, see § Eponymous categories and § Non-diffusing subcategories."), and also on [[Wikipedia:Categorization dos and don'ts]] ("Use the most specific categories possible.") |
::::::{{user|GSK}} What do you mean when you say "too literally"? It's stated pretty clearly in the text I've just quoted to you, later on under [[WP:SUBCAT]] ("Pages (and subcategories) should not usually be placed in both a given category and any of its subcategories or parent categories. For some exceptions to this, see § Eponymous categories and § Non-diffusing subcategories."), and also on [[Wikipedia:Categorization dos and don'ts]] ("Use the most specific categories possible.") |
||
