Talk:Benjamin Britten
Infobox name: new section
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 19:08, 22 April 2026 | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
:Even without taking the MOS violation into account, I like that photo better than the current one; it seems more suitable for a lead image. I'd support the change. [[User:Sentimental Dork|Sentimental Dork]] ([[User talk:Sentimental Dork|talk]]) 04:34, 13 April 2026 (UTC) |
:Even without taking the MOS violation into account, I like that photo better than the current one; it seems more suitable for a lead image. I'd support the change. [[User:Sentimental Dork|Sentimental Dork]] ([[User talk:Sentimental Dork|talk]]) 04:34, 13 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:: I added to some of his compositions of around the time, such as [[War Requiem]]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC) |
:: I added to some of his compositions of around the time, such as [[War Requiem]]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
== Infobox name == |
|||
Seems to be some disagreement about whether the Infobox should give the most common name or the formal name. In general, infoboxes like this give formal names. I can point to hundreds of articles that use the "The Right Honourable The Lord X [Postnominals]" format whether or not that is the most common name. [[Bertrand Russell]], for example, or [[Stanley Baldwin]] or [[Bernard Montgomery]] or [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]]. Why should Britten be treated differently? [[User:John K|john k]] ([[User talk:John K|talk]]) 19:08, 22 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
