Talk:0.999...
It’s time to fix this page: new section
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 11:23, 23 April 2026 | ||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
::Also agree that ''both "infinite sequence" and "infinite list" seem fine''. [[User:Mr swordfish|Mr. Swordfish]] ([[User talk:Mr swordfish|talk]]) 02:37, 2 April 2026 (UTC) |
::Also agree that ''both "infinite sequence" and "infinite list" seem fine''. [[User:Mr swordfish|Mr. Swordfish]] ([[User talk:Mr swordfish|talk]]) 02:37, 2 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
:After reading Imaginatorium's contribution above, I agree that "unending sequence" might be better for the intended readership of this article. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 01:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC) |
:After reading Imaginatorium's contribution above, I agree that "unending sequence" might be better for the intended readership of this article. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 01:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC) |
||
== It’s time to fix this page == |
|||
Guys, come on. Fix this already |
|||
1) I can always find another number to stuff between repeating 9 and one just add another decimal place |
|||
2) infinity is not a number, it’s a concept you can’t perform arithmetic against it |
|||
3) limits didn’t exist in euler’s time you misrepresent his work under modern contexts |
|||
it’s time you fix this page [[Special:Contributions/~2026-24847-48|~2026-24847-48]] ([[User talk:~2026-24847-48|talk]]) 11:23, 23 April 2026 (UTC) |
|||
